Labour's controversial proposal to
introduce a capital gains tax - estimated to reap $26 billion
over 15 years, principally from property sales - does not
include any details of the crucial administrative costs
involved.
While Labour has several tax specialists of international
ranking backing the introduction of a capital gains tax
(CGT), other tax specialists are claiming the administrative
costs will be overwhelming, largely because of the complexity
of CGT.
Labour leader Phil Goff estimates the tax take in the first
year, from 2013, will be $78 million and over 15 years $26
billion, but in an interview yesterday he acknowledged he had
no costings on collecting and enforcing the wide-ranging tax
regime, for either the first year or the 15-year period.
"The costs will be no higher than income tax is now," he
said, but agreed he did not know what that figure was at
present either.
Just as National has hung its election hat on proposing a
partial sale of state-owned assets, Labour's gamble is the
introduction of its across-the-board and "fair" CGT, which
will be used to repay national debt, give some tax breaks and
help grow the economy.
Many New Zealanders have in the past three decades built up
equity and asset value in second homes, while at the time
renting them out, with a view to creating a retirement
nest-egg.
"A 15% tax is not draconian. Tax is paid on income and
investment ... Why should people not pay on capital gains?
Everyone should be treated equally," Mr Goff said.
When asked what claim a government had to take tens of
thousands of dollars from would-be retirees selling a
property, he emphasised it was not a retrospective tax, but
based on valuations from 2013 where they were "only paying
15%" on any actual capital gain.
Mr Goff said the previous property boom had pushed up New
Zealand's interest rates, foreign exchange rates subsequently
spiralled and the export sector's costs had risen
correspondingly.
He said introducing a CGT was a "fairer tax system all
round".
There were no plans for IRD to get a fiscal boost to
administer the CGT regime, or plans to overhaul the present
taxation, a call increasingly being made by tax specialists.
"It's one step at a time," he said of any overall review or
overhauling of the tax regime.
Mr Goff said for every $1 IRD received to administer tax at
present, it got a return of $6.
He questioned why, while property investment amounted to $200
billion, the tax revenue from that sector came in at minus
$500 million.
He quoted reports from the International Monetary Fund and
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development that
pointed out New Zealand, Turkey and Switzerland were the only
OECD countries not applying CGT.
"Tax loopholes already cost millions to enforce. The IMF and
OECD reports have repeatedly said this is a massive problem
for New Zealand," Mr Goff said.
Tax specialists spoken to in Dunedin have said the present
tax regime requires a complete overhaul, especially given the
CGT will add layers of complexity to the existing regime.
With both Labour and National trying to shift people away
from the bubble-prone property sector, Mr Goff claimed a
partial sell-off of state-owned enterprises proposed by
National would be good only for lawyers and sharebrokers,
with profits to overseas shareholders.
However, he rejected the suggestion by tax specialists that
the CGT would be a "boon" for accountants, valuers and tax
specialists, as the CGT would close existing loopholes and
would increase revenue.
As expected, National's Associate Finance Minister Steven
Joyce has claimed Labour's CGT would add $18.5 billion to the
Crown's net debt, and the proposal had underestimated
billions of dollars needed to borrow to maintain Government
capital investment, extra interest costs and overestimated
revenues.
Mr Goff said Mr Joyce's figures were also out, being wrong by
about $2.2 billion.
Capital gains tax
Assets taxable at 15%
• Investment properties
• Commercial properties
• Businesses Shares
Asset exemptions
• Family home
• Farm home/section
• Collectables
• Retirement payouts
• Bank term deposits
- simon.hartley@odt.co.nz
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.