National is filing yet another complaint against Labour,
saying it has breached the Electoral Finance Act.
Yesterday Labour faced some embarrassment when it turned out
the family used in a leaflet explaining what Labour's budget
policy "means for you" is part-Hispanic and from the United
States, not New Zealand.
The leaflet is funded from the Parliamentary Service budget
and as it is authorised by the party would have to be
declared against the election spending cap under the
Electoral Finance Act (EFA).
National Party Deputy Leader Bill English said Prime Minister
Helen Clark's office may be in breach of the EFA over the
production and distribution of the leaflet.
"Comments made by Labour to the media confirm the
controversial election advertisement was entirely the work of
the Labour leader's office," Mr English said.
"That means the Labour leader's office has become a separate
promoter of election advertisements and should be registered
as a third party."
Mr English said he would be writing to the Electoral
Commission as anyone who intends to spend more than $12,000
in election year to promote a particular party has to
register as a third party.
"Helen Clark's leader's office is not exempt."
The National Party recently took legal action against the
Engineering, Printing and Manufacturing Union, saying it
could not register as a third party and campaign as it was
too closely linked to the Labour Party.
Mr English said after the last election when Labour was
dealing with the police over the pledge card spending there
was a distinction between being the prime minister and the
prime minister's office.
"They made that distinction," Mr English said.
He said the law was absurd.
"You have these third party rules and no one knows what they
mean, so we are saying it has to be tested, as does the union
matter."
The leaflet has created another legal uncertainty with one
expert on the EFA, Graeme Edgeler, questioning whether the
payment from Parliamentary Services for the leaflet should be
treated as a donation.
Mr Edgeler told NZPA that it was a grey area, it could be
that the initial payment to the parliamentary wing of the
Labour Party was a donation; or the gift of the parliamentary
wing of the leaflet to the wider party could be a donation.
Mr Edgeler agreed it might seem strange that a payment that
had to be made by law could be treated as a donation, but it
was certainly an idea that could be tested.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.