Dog owner petitions for vet bill subsidy

Queenstown's David Simpson, with his pet chihuahua Buster, wants the Government to subsidise vet bills. Photo by Christina McDonald.
Queenstown's David Simpson, with his pet chihuahua Buster, wants the Government to subsidise vet bills. Photo by Christina McDonald.
A Queenstown man is asking why vet bills are not subsidised.

David Simpson owns two chihuahuas with his wife and planned to hand over a petition at 11am today to a staff member at Clutha-Southland member of Parliament Bill English's office in Frankton.

His petition asks that the ''House of Representatives look at the viability of reducing veterinary costs to the consumer, especially to those on low incomes''.

Mr Simpson accepts there will be debate for and against the proposal and said the idea that people on low incomes should not own a pet is not a watertight argument.

''I understand that logic ... but let's face it, a lot of people have pets but [then] circumstances change in their life.''

He pointed to people who had inherited a pet from a deceased relative and said his dogs were bought to be companions for his wife and are cherished.

A petition to the House of Representatives needs to be signed by at least one person and petitions are allocated to a select committee which could then seek further information, hear evidence and make recommendations.

Vet Subsidy

Even the thought that government should waste our taxes even reading the stupid petition gets my back up. If you can't afford to look after your mutt just put it out of its misery.

Dentist

Maybe a good subsidy for dental visits would be first in line, I think.

Vet bills

A pet is a living breathing creature, hence they are going to be unwell at times and this is an added expense one must consider before buying or taking on an animal.

To expect the taxpayer to cover these expenses is ludicrous, but might I suggest if you can afford a pet, then do look into pet insurance. It is relatively inexpensive (can be as little as $14 a month). If you cannot afford to pay for vet bills or for pet insurance, then don't have a pet. To avoid taking a sick animal to a vet is animal neglect. 

 

 

I don't see why not

I don't see why not, provided the dogs in question have paid taxes all their lives. Oh wait... dogs don't pay taxes, do they. For goodness sake, taxpayers being asked to subsidise treatment for little yappy dogs? Spare me!