A New Zealand chapter of the world's largest environmental
conservation authority says reports that the Government could
carve up Mount Aspiring National Park for mining "fly in the
face" of international trends.
World Conservation Union (WCU) New Zealand spokesman Bruce
Jefferies, of Wanaka, said the Government's stance on the
possibility of mineral exploration within national parks was
criticised during a recent international environment
conference in Mexico.
• Asbestos mining tried in park in
1970s
At the ninth World Wilderness Congress in Merida, Mexico,
last month, he successfully proposed a resolution to more
than 1500 delegates to lobby the New Zealand Government to
review its policy.
In August, Minister of Energy and Resources Gerry Brownlee
announced a government review of schedule 4 of the Crown
Minerals Act, which prohibits mining and exploration in
protected areas such as national parks.
On Monday, the Green Party released a leaked memo -
understood to be from a Ministry of Economic Development
report - which recommends a 20% northwest sector of Mount
Aspiring National Park, near the Haast Pass - be removed from
schedule 4.
Removing mining protection from Mount Aspiring National Park
would "without doubt" call into question the integrity of the
Te Wahi Pounamu (South Westland) World Heritage Area, Mr
Jefferies told the Otago Daily Times.
Delegates at the World Wilderness Congress had expressed
their concerns about the Government's audit of mineral
resources within protected areas, including its World
Heritage Sites, he said.
The Congress resolved to urge the Government to reaffirm its
commitment to internationally endorsed protected areas, he
said.
A resolution was also passed that the World Commission on
Protected Areas - of which Mr Jefferies is the deputy
vice-chairman delegate for Oceania - ask the Government to
retain the "no mining" status quo measures in protected areas
around New Zealand.
"Mining exploration and development within the existing
protected-area system is fundamentally inconsistent with the
values these areas were established to protect," Mr Jefferies
said.
Mr Brownlee has said the Government had already indicated
that where land had high conservation value it "wouldn't be
touched".
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.