The economy, it is fair to say, is very gradually improving
after the short-lived recession, although the position so far
as internal and external debt is concerned remains grave.
New Zealand, fortunately, is nowhere near in as bad a way as
Britain, whose economy is practically in ruins, and where
after last week's budget, every household will be worse off
as the new government tries to rebuild.
A vast range of cuts has been imposed to try to reduce
government spending and pay off the colossal debt load.
New Zealand has dealt with similar problems in budgets of the
past two years, but beyond the immediate future the economy
faces what may turn out to be a difficulty of very serious
proportions: a lack of capital.
The signs are already obvious.
The long-lasting property bubble, into which so much finance
company venture capital and personal savings have been sunk,
has yet again proved to be a chimera so far as long-term
benefit to the economy and job creation are concerned.
The kind of public service job creation the Clark government
indulged in has also proved to be a serious drag on the
economy: since 2004 more than half of all new jobs were in
public administration, health, and education.
Over the same period 40,000 jobs disappeared from
agriculture, horticulture, forestry, manufacturing, and
transport - what some have described as the "earning side "
of the economy, the tradeable sector.
Public service jobs in health and education now make up an
extraordinary third of all jobs, according to the Government.
Nor is there much comfort in recent statistics which show
that total employment increased by just 1%, or 22,000 jobs,
in the March quarter.
Yet even this was the largest quarterly increase since the
recession began.
The Government is pinning its hopes on the ambitious Treasury
forecast of 170,000 new jobs in four years, and since the cap
on the public service is supposedly rigorous, most of these
will have to arise from the private productive sector.
Here, the Government's expectations are restrained by at
least two important factors: the lack of reasonably priced
venture capital for small to middle-sized businesses, and the
replacement of human workers by technological advances.
This can easily be observed in the State's own enterprises,
which have a present value of about $50 billion in commercial
assets.
They are subject to similar forces, and to the effects of
technology and competition.
Some, such as Solid Energy, urgently need more capital to
maintain or improve their situation.
Where is it to come from? Some, like New Zealand Post, are
losing market share to technology.
What is its future? The private sector is in possibly a worse
position, since trading banks are much more risk averse to
business lending; most of our leading companies are actually
overseas-owned or influenced, and New Zealand is not
necessarily a priority for growth for their directors; local
lending innovations of the past, such as the Rural Bank and
the Development Finance Corporation, no longer exist and are
in any case politically unfashionable.
There is some prospect of help, however, in the recent
disclosure that the NZ Superannuation Fund is looking to
invest in more local assets including land, smaller
high-growth companies and tribal businesses.
As at the end of April, the fund had only 32% of its assets
(including cash) invested here.
It wants to invest another $500 million locally.
That will help, but the Government cannot be enthusiastic
about more borrowing externally for local business expansion
since, as Bill English told Parliament this week: "New
Zealand's external liabilities have risen almost 40% to $167
billion over the past five years.
The cost of servicing this is more than 5% of GDP.
At almost 90% of GDP, our external liabilities are similar to
those of Spain, Ireland, Portugal, Hungary, and Greece."
And as the Reserve Bank Governor, Alan Bollard, noted earlier
this month, the financing consequences of years of running
external deficits mean that foreigners have more than twice
as much invested in New Zealand as we have invested overseas.
"Our net external liabilities cannot keep increasing with
impunity. Ultimately either the markets will penalise us by
requiring a larger premium for its continued funding, and/or
the sheer size of servicing our obligations will become an
intolerable burden to the country.
"But rather than await such painful punishments, we should be
looking to improve the situation."
Treasury forecasts show steady economic growth of about 3% a
year and that is an extremely modest number.
Clearly, though, there will be no new "value-added" jobs
unless and until the confidence of businesses to invest and
to employ is restored and investors are willing to risk their
money.
Our collective failure to do that will inevitably mean all
taxpayers will face what the British and other European
disaster economies are now confronting.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.