New Zealand First leader Winston Peters, as is his habit,
protests too much.
He sees the sale of the Crafar farms, which went into
receivership in 2009, to Chinese-owned company Shanghai
Pengxin, as "economic treason".
The Labour Party, too, has weighed in calling it a "massive
kick in the guts" for local farmers and iwi.
The outcry over the decision of the Government to act on the
recommendations of the Overseas Investment Office in
approving the Crafar farms bid by a Shanghai Pengxin, masks
the fact that the sale of such land has become commonplace:
consents have been granted for the sale of 357,056 hectares
of agricultural land to foreign interests in the last two
years.
United States buyers have acquired 25,306ha; German citizens
have bought 6834ha; 9727ha have gone to the Swiss; Australia
has acquired 3861ha; and 22,600ha of farm land has gone to
owners fromthe United Kingdom.
The Crafar farms, owned by Allan, Frank and Beth Crafar, went
into receivership in October 2009. The company KordaMentha
was appointed receiver.
The relevant 13 dairy farms and three dry stock runs included
properties spread throughout the North Island. A Chinese
company Natural Dairy (NZ) Holdings, which previously had
been known as the China Jin Hui Mining Corporation, sought to
buy the Crafar farms pending OIO approval in 2010, as did
state-owned enterprise Landcorp.
These bids were declined and in January last year the present
bid, approved yesterday, was received by Milk New Zealand
Holding Ltd, a subsidiary of Shanghai Pengxin. The winning
bid is thought to be in the region of $200 million.
The next best bid is that of the Crafar Farms Purchase Group,
at $171.5 million. This group consists of Auckland
businessman, Sir Michael Fay, Central North Island farmers
and iwi groups. It has filed for a judicial review of the
decision in the Wellington High Court.
Running through all the opposition is the notion that it is
somehow unpatriotic to sell farm land to the Chinese - and
that this sale is the thin end of a wedge that will
infiltrate a vertically integrated milk production and
processing operation, which could eventually undermine the
strength and market position of, for instance, Fonterra.
But Sir Michael Fay's credentials for arguing from a
standpoint of economic patriotism are little short of
laughable, given his past history of profiting from the
buying and selling of strategic assets, including Tranz Rail
in the early 1990s.
It is also a proposition that has been factored into the OIO
consent conditions which not only required the bid to meet a
number of stipulations - including the creation of jobs,
increased export receipts, added investment, and
environmental considerations - but also mandated the limited
extent to which the parent company could involve itself in
processing operations.
Where the opposition to the deal has force - and it is a
point that has not yet been satisfactorily answered - is why
the farms had to be sold as a package, putting them out of
reach of most New Zealand farming interests, rather than as
individual propositions.
This, however, is down to the receiver, rather than the
Government, although it does make something of a mockery of
the latter's former claims to greater oversight on offshore
ownership.
While the Labour Party, and Mr Peters, might make much of the
fact that Landcorp will run the farms - rendering, somewhat
bizarrely, a taxpayer-owned company a tenant in its own
country - it was the Labour Party which championed closer
economic ties with China through its pioneering Free Trade
Agreement.
The Government says this deal has nothing to do with the FTA,
but written into the consent is a requirement for Milk New
Zealand to "assist Landcorp to extend its business to, and
market its products in, China".
When other sales of land to overseas owners are considered,
and the safeguards written into the consent considered, the
outcry over this bid has been disproportionate.
Its real importance to New Zealand is the extent to which it
strengthens ties with a market fast becoming this country's
most important economic lifeline.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.