If there were once only two certainties in this life - death
and taxes - then during the past several years another has
emerged: power price rises in winter.
And winter has come early this year, with the country in the
grip of an unseasonably wet and cold blast - which has seen
snow in patches over much of the South, and the central North
Island, and record rainfall in and around Dunedin.
Consumers will have been cranking up their heating systems
and doubtless anticipating larger-than-average power bills
for this time of the year.
It comes as a welcome, and overdue, relief then to hear, in
the wake of a damning report from the Commerce Commission on
the strategies of state-owned power generator-retailers, that
Energy Minister Gerry Brownlee is pushing for a price freeze.
More than that, there are indications the Government is going
to look again at the entire market model for electricity
developed and implemented when it was last in office during
the 1990s.
The commission's report found that the big four
generator-retailers - Meridian, Genesis, Mighty River Power
and Contact Energy, the first three of which are state-owned
- had overcharged consumers by as much as $4.3 billion during
the past six years.
The commission said that it had found no evidence of
price-fixing or market collusion, but that the four companies
had used their market dominance to maximise profits through
"lawful, rational exploitation" of the rules - with the
result that wholesale power prices had been on average 18%
higher than they should have been between the years 2001-07.
In addition, prices to the consumer rose by 72% over the
years 2000-08 while inflation went up only 29%.
Given the huge salaries of executives in these SOEs, and the
constant generation of public relations material to justify
the regular price rises inflicted on the consumer, this is
simply unacceptable.
It makes a mockery of the constant refrain by the same
companies as to the reason their prices never fall - even
when the hydo lakes are overflowing and the spot price for
electricity plummets, as it did to zero at Benmore last
weekend. This, they say, is because the consumer is shielded
from extreme fluctuations by their carefully calibrated
"middle-of-the-road" tariffs.
The reality, as the report makes clear, is that New
Zealanders pay too much for power.
The competitive market model has not delivered cheaper
electricity to the consumer and Mr Brownlee could not be
clearer in noting the problems.
"There is something fundamentally wrong with the way in which
we are marketing electricity in New Zealand," he said, adding
that it would be "audacious" for power companies to raise
their prices while a review conducted by a ministerial panel
was in progress.
There is scope for party politics in all this and,
unsurprisingly, it has been evident in some of the reaction
to date.
Mr Brownlee has implied that the Labour Party, whose tenure
in government the report covers, was negligent, and that the
Electricity Commission, established by Labour to exert some
influence over generation, prices and forward planning, has
seriously misfired.
For its part, Labour can say it inherited the market model
from National, and itself set in train the Commerce
Commission report - which has been several years in the
making.
Consumers could be forgiven for saying "a plague on all their
houses".
Domestic consumers use only about a third of the power
generated in this country and it has to be asked whether it
is reasonable that they pay such a high tariff.
Certainly it is a finite resource to be used carefully,
sparingly, and people should pay for it in proportion to
their consumption.
But equally it is quite wrong that particularly elderly and
vulnerable New Zealanders must retreat to their beds at all
hours of the day and night simply to keep warm, while
state-owned companies plunder ever greater profits from the
sector.
It must be possible to strike a better, fairer balance.
The signals this week from the Government are promising, but
now that the flaws and iniquities of the current system have
been so publicly exposed, it must be held to account in
addressing the fundamental issues in the coming months - as
the real winter sets in.
Good appraisal, but apples with apples
Yes, there has been overcharging from a mere tick-over point of view. They are idealogically pushed from both major parties, to provide for growth, and are looking to fund that.
The problems are multiple: You are quite right, hydro is a finite resource, but there are two encroaching paradigms - both driven by the peaking of oil supply.
One is that anything that is done by oil that can be done by electricity will experience that transition. The other is that oil-based industry will decline (can't not) and thus it's demand for power will decline.
The melding of those concurrent (sorry 'bout the pun) changes has not been studied, and it follows that they haven't been planned for.
The other separate thing you touch on, is really just the middle-class disconnect from reality. Those old folk you feel sorry for because they are cold, are the same ones who ripped in to the finite resources of the world in a way, and on a scale, never seen.
They chewed them up, and spat them out, leaving empty mines, empty wells, full rubbish tips, etc etc, for future generations to address. In essence, they lived beyond their means, and others will have to pick up the tab. Boo Hoo.
They perhaps should have spent their resource-capital more wisely.
They will plead ignorance, of course. "Nobody told us" will be the refrain. Now who is it that should have been doing the telling? See where I'm going?
Get on with the telling......