A rare piece of good news emerged for beleaguered ratepayers
this week: the Otago Regional Council draft annual plan shows
no increase in the general rate. The ORC chairman
points out it is a draft budget only, but nevertheless, how
refreshing. Why can't other councils do the same?
To be fair, as a regional council, the ORC is not charged
with those large and expensive tasks like supplying water,
processing sewage or maintaining roads which fall to district
and city councils. But, as clearly evidenced in the
Canterbury regional council's woes, the regulatory and
planning demands are exacting and no easier with every
passing year.
Although the Otago council's long-term community plan
predicted a rate increase, corporate services director Wayne
Scott said higher-than-expected interest income and work on
cost control helped reduce the need for general rates.
It is difficult to know from the outside about cost control,
although Mr Scott and the regional council over many years
mostly have had a good reputation for close care with
expenditure. One glaring exception is the council's planned
$31 million headquarters project on the waterfront.
It has been "parked", as options are considered, and this
has, at least for the time being, cut spending from reserves.
In turn, much more interest income to subsidise the general
rates is available - $887,000 instead of $432,000. What this
makes obvious is spending from reserves does come with costs
to ratepayers.
While there is widespread agreement the current headquarters
are too small and inadequate and something substantial needs
to be done, the fact that money is coming from reserves - or
Port Otago dividends for that matter - does not sidestep the
issue that it is ratepayers' money and such spending will
impact on them.
Any spending justifications have to be on the same basis as
if the money came directly via rate demands.
The "parking" of the headquarters also allows a special
dividend from Port Otago to be reduced from $12.7 million to
$6.8 million. If Port Otago's balance sheet is strengthened
and debts limited, its position in the future to subsidise
rates through dividends will be a little stronger, as will
its position in negotiations with Lyttelton Port Company.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.