It may come as a surprise to many adults that our police last
year apprehended a 5-year-old and two 6-year-old boys for
"sexual assault" - among a dozen children aged under 9 who
committed "sexual offences".
No person under the age of 10 can be convicted of an offence
but, since it is the job of the police to uphold the law,
they must act upon complaints or when they have grounds for
believing an offence has been committed.
Sensible parents are well aware that a child of tender years
will at some point engage in harmless exploration of a sexual
nature and some would argue that it is a normal part of how a
child begins to understand itself and its body.
But for most adults it would be a long reach to describe this
kind of activity as "sexual assault".
Is a child of 5 or 6 able to comprehend what "sexual assault"
might be? Or are the reported cases the result of a panicked
parent discovering some infantile experimentation?It is
simply extraordinary that the police "apprehended" a
4-year-old girl, two 5-year-old girls and five 5-year-old
boys last year for offences such as shoplifting, burglary or
the theft of property valued under $500.
Was there a Fagin-like character hidden in the shadows? We
cannot tell because the police decline to disclose any
details, on the spurious grounds of "privacy".
There is, perhaps, a clue in comments by an Auckland
University psychologist noting children who committed crimes
generally modelled their behaviour on that of their parents.
The country certainly needs no reminding of the appalling way
some adults, including parents, treat children.
Our rates of child abuse are a national disgrace but in
reviewing the child crime statistics provided by the police,
a large degree of caution is required, especially in relation
to alleged "crimes" committed by the very young.
It is a different matter with some of the more serious
offences involving somewhat older children.
While the 156 offences involving shoplifting might be
considered nothing out of the ordinary, what should the
community think of the nine assaults with a weapon, the
single instance of threatening to kill, the five caught in
possession of cannabis, the 34 arsonists? These all involved
older - but still primary school-aged - children, and there
were among them those with severe behavioural problems.
Yet efforts by the police youth services, schools, Child,
Youth and Family and parents have led to a decrease in the
number of very young offenders.
Ten years ago the numbers were twice those of the past year,
which surely reflects the subsequent success of co-ordinated
intervention.
Even so, it is a disturbing reflection of modern society that
more than 700 young children were considered sufficiently
delinquent to justify police apprehension for criminal
offences.
Although such children cannot be charged, they are given
warning or otherwise cautioned, or referred to the police's
youth aid section, and in rare cases referred to the Family
Court.
But what is being done about the real transgressors: the
parents and caregivers? We need as a community to look deeply
into our own hearts and behaviour, examine the society we
have constructed and its innate dark side, and seek ways of
ensuring the safety of the innocent.
It is obvious that normality is represented in some
households by children being routinely abused and neglected,
drugs traded and consumed, liquor freely sought and drunk,
employment a novelty, gambling common, personal relationships
as changeable as the weather, and hostility towards or
suspicion of neighbours, let alone help agencies, customary.
A child brought up in such circumstances is bound to be
influenced in a negative way.
It may well be "sexual assault" or "threatening to kill" or
"burglary" in the dry, unemotional language of the law, but
much more likely to be "normal" behaviour in the mind of a
neglected child.
And by neglected, surely that must mean a child brought up
within a family quite ignorant about proper upbringing,
safety, general health and eating habits - there are all too
many such, if the evidence and melancholy statistics produced
by the authorities are a reliable guide.
In truth, a community gets what it asks for.
It asked for the freedom to gamble 24 hours a day; it asked
for alcohol to be sold to anyone over 18 years at any time;
it turns a blind eye to minor drug use, ignores or tolerates
minor offending; permits the proliferation of offensive
imported popular culture likely to influence the behaviour of
indiscriminate and uncritical mentalities, and repeatedly
elects governments which resile from giving the highest
priority to confronting and correcting the attitudes of the
illiterate and the unthinking towards our most precious
national resource: our children.
If every child is to be safe - and safe from crime - every
citizen must make safety in all its senses their priority.
Strong, loving and safe families and neighbourhoods - not the
over-burdened State - will guarantee a healthy future for our
children, and we must never forget that all children are our
children.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.