There are ways the costs of fighting wilding conifers can
be mitigated, writes forestry consultant Jim
Childerstone.
In response to the problems, and the costs, of wilding
conifer control (ODT, 28.12.11) there is considerable
scope to mitigate much of these costs with the recovery of
saleable wood in the form of saw logs, post timber
(roundwood), firewood and the potential income from chipping
residue for boiler fuel.
The latter is becoming a serious contender as a source for
alternative energy to fossil fuels, a project I had been
investigating for much of last year. And there is a huge
potential source of biomass, particularly from wilding
clearance.
Some Queenstown businesses are looking at this as an
alternative to other more expensive heating methods.
Furnace conversions are already taking place in Dunedin and
Invercargill, including for schools and community centres.
In 2006 the Queenstown Lakes District Council adopted a
commissioned forestry plan by forestry consultant Branislav
Zoric, which effectively divided about 650ha of reserves into
separate compartments covering the mature mixed-age forested
areas. The majority were mostly conifer species, 80% Douglas
fir, the rest European larch and sycamore. Not included were
remnant colonies of indigenous red and alpine beech, mostly
next to the creek catchments.
I was recruited, part time, to assist the implementation of
the plan, having issued forestry reports to previous councils
in late 1990s while employed by the Crown Forestry Resource
Management Group. The object was to select mature trees of
good form for log recovery, leaving others to mature. Net
returns were targeted to improve the forests, and the
recreational activities within, and also to open the canopy
and contain outlier regeneration.
This had originally been achieved in 1998 when several
hundred tonnes of top-grade Douglas fir log was extracted on
the two lower terraces, giving net returns to the council of
about $180,000. Later in 2006-07, two limited harvests of
about 1.5ha allowed space for establishing Sequoia
dendrum seedlings as a buffer to exclude conifer
regeneration. The emphasis for the long term was to implement
a managed forest on a more commercial basis, utilising
proceeds from harvests for improvements and containment.
Since then, emissions trading scheme carbon credits can
generate extra income.
A partial clearance of wilding Pinus nigra (Corsican
pine) at Closeburn yielded returns of several thousand
dollars to the landowner with recovery of mostly post timber.
The fallacy that exotic conifer forests will exclude all
other growth can be proved that with an open canopy, because
of thinning and select harvest, a prolific under-story of
mostly Pittosporum, Coprosma, wineberry and
broadleaf native species can take over ground cover.
Unfortunately, so will Himalayan honeysuckle and broom, but
they can easily be controlled with harvest income.
A good example is Dunedin City Forests' stand of 80-year-old
Douglas fir at Flagstaff on Three Mile hill.
One of the problems was to limit conifer seedling spread into
the native beech and on to alpine shrubbery. Part of my
contract was to hand-clear regenerating conifer seedlings on
the edges with a chainsaw and loppers. This gave an
indication what a gang of volunteers could achieve within "X"
number of working hours.
However, in the hard-to-get areas on steep ridges and gullies
the answer possibly is aerial spray application, which after
several years is likely to leave a skeletal array of dead
forests and a considerably increased fire risk.
What of future options?
This is mainly dependent on available funding, as well as on
new technology, scientific research and new tools for
control.
Considerable research is under way on the use of bioenergy
from vegetation.
Contractors now use improved plant and machinery to handle
forests on steep, almost inaccessible sites. A percentage of
wilding conifer growth could be accessible for commercial
recovery of products to mitigate costs. Already this has been
achieved with limited logging operations around Closeburn
developments. The recovery included post and pole wood, saw
logs and firewood.
While there is still a cost for cleaning up residue from
landings and cut-over areas, there is potential for chipping
into boiler fuel. A variety of plant is now available for
processing this material. Owners of commercial forests have
been paid royalties of between $15 and $20 for processed
post-harvest residue. Depending on harvest methods about 20%
of residue remains on landings and skid sites.
Recovery from mixed-age wilding trees can vary between 20%
and 50% in firewood, log and roundwood form. The costs of
aerial spraying can vary from $650 a hectare to $2700. The
newly developed spray mix targets mainly Douglas fir and
larch species, but it is not so efficient and more costly to
knock out pines, and can take up to three years to have an
effect.
Then there is still the problem of dead trees giving an
unsightly look to the landscape, as well as increased fire
danger.
How to recover this source of potential energy is a work in
progress. A professional logging contractor would charge
similar prices per hectare for wilding clearance but given
incentives would endeavour to recover saleable wood or, where
possible, undertake a clearance operation for nil charges. A
crucial factor is the follow-up treatment.
We need constant reminding that the landscape surrounding
Wakatipu and elsewhere has been consistently modified over
the past 150 years. Trees were grown on the Bobs Peak
southern face to prevent rock falls, which had been a threat
in the early years of settlement.
Also, most of open high country, including the Remarkables,
had been grazed over this period.
Saving the native bush and alpine shrubbery will be a
constant battle, keeping volunteers engaged for the rest of
the millennium - and beyond.
But there is still money in trees. They are a renewable
resource and carbon neutral in rotation or when in a
continuous state of management.
- Jim Childerstone (Jim's Forest Services) has
been working on some of these issues for 30 years.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.