Increase in workplace drug testing

More southern employers are opting to drug-test their staff, and the New Zealand Drug Detection Agency said business is booming in Otago and Southland.

Workers for about 80 companies in Otago - the majority in Dunedin - now faced drug tests using NZDDA services as part of their employment.

NZDDA Otago-Southland general manager John Galliven, of Dunedin, said the Otago branch was formed only 18 months ago, and had been joined since by a Southland branch in June last year.

The number of Otago employers using the service had "easily doubled" in the past year, and the two branches together had experienced "about 400%" customer growth in the same period, he said.

That included the Dunedin City Council, the first southern council to become an NZDDA customer, which the Otago Daily Times this week reported was asking staff to consider a new alcohol-and-other-drugs policy.

Mr Galliven said "quite a few" other southern employers were also in talks to implement drug policies using NZDDA's services.

He would not confirm if that included other southern councils, saying only "there's going to be lots of things on the way".

The demand was being driven by a desire of employers to improve their health and safety performance, in line with legislative requirements.

That would lower organisations' health and safety costs, but also meant more workers went home safely each night, he said.

"At the end of the day, all we want to see is people going home to their families in one piece."

The demand was also increasing as more employers saw others implementing policies, he believed.

Nationwide, NZDDA staff carried out about 3500 tests each month.

However, Mr Galliven - a former Dunedin police detective - said the tests were not about "sacking workers".

Employers did not want to lose trained staff, and used rehabilitation programmes to help those found to be impaired at work.

Despite that, he made no apology for encouraging workers to change their personal habits to ensure safety at work.

"It also extends to their home life as well. Once they've kicked certain habits into touch, you generally find you've got a more productive worker, a safer worker and probably the home life is not too worse off for it either."

The tests had raised privacy concerns, with some southern workers complaining to their unions, and NORML New Zealand - the pro-marijuana law reform group - argued the drug's lingering presence did not constitute impairment.

Reality

It's still a sad reality that in some Dunedin firms, if you pass an alcohol test, then someone hands you a drink so that you can catch up.

Drug and alcohol testing

I work in an industry that at times "random" tests employees for drug and alcohol. We also have "compulsory" drug and alcohol testing for any employee that has any accident in the work place or makes major mistakes in their work.Of course all new employees have to be drug and alcohol tested and proven 100% negative before starting! This random drug and alcohol testing is one of the best things to be introduced into our industry, it is endorsed by our union and all employees.To pass the test the tolerance is zero!

I and most others in our industry will refuse to work with those that don't pass drug and alcohol testing or have their thinking impaired by alcohol or drugs, be they legal or not. If you're on drugs or alcohol you will not be welcome in our industry (Mining and related).

Drugs and alcohol

It should be drugs AND alcohol testing given so many people party and get extremely drunk, both during the week and at the weekend.

Drug testing

I strongly agree that drug testing in the work place can
be an excellent tool for preventing workplace accidents in certain industries for
example positions that involve operating heavy machinery, driving or medical
professionals just to name a few if testing is used correctly.  

However, I feel it can also be a major breach
of human rights when a workplace uses drug testing with an inappropriate
intention in mind such as lowering costs for the organisation or they have an ulterior
motive of wanting to get rid of a person and being aware they use drugs in
their own time so by testing they have a reason for instant dismissal even
though that person may have never been under the influence of drugs while
working. 

Drug testing

It really is time we pulled the carpet from beneath the feet of NZDDA, preferably by legalising marijuana.

Responsibility in the workplace

In my working years, spanning 50 years, I had the advantage, if you could call it that, of working in a huge variety of different occupations, ranging from electrical design, to labouring. There is enough dangerous machinery, out there, to make sobriety and freedom from the effects of drugs, a critical issue where safety in the workplace is concerned. That might not apply in and around City Hall, where it is likely that cases of 'rigor mortis' would pass unnoticed, but it certainly applies in the workplaces which make up the 'engine-room' of our country's economy. In any case, the use of certain drugs, including cannabis, is not sanctioned legally, and for that reason alone, compliance in the workplace should be respected. Unfortunately, there is a generation out there, which regards compliance with all laws as 'optional'. The solution to drug-testing in the workplace is simple. Don't touch the stuff, and the 'bean-counters' will become so tired of shelling out for 'zero' returns on their investment, that they will quickly see-to-it that money is no-longer being wasted on unnecessary testing.
[Abridged]

A private company pushing an Orwellian agenda

Despite their 'official' sounding title, the New Zealand Drug Detection Agency, or 'NZDDA', is a private for-profit company and their bottom line is to make money. Their agenda is clear - approach organisations, and point out parts of their policies which could be interpreted from one angle as implying that drug tests are 'necessary' to ensure workers 'health and safety'. This is a complete load of codswollop.
The main problem is that the drug tests to not detect impairment itself, only the chemical presence of the drug. In the case of cannabis, for example, traces of the drug can remain in a person's system for weeks, despite the 'high' only lasting a few hours. Many New Zealanders use cannabis in their own time in a responsible way, and no impairment carries on into their work life.
However the NZDDA has stated themselves in this article that they also want to eliminate the use of these substances in people's home lives as well. This is a breach of privacy and an undermining of respect for workers. In the end, NZDDA wants profit. They will put forth arguments in any way that they can to encourage more and more organisations to disrespect and objectify their staff members by making them pee into bottles to see if they've been being naughty at the weekend.
[Abridged]