The ORFU/Highlander split. ODT graphic.
The papers have been served and the divorce between
Otago and the Highlanders is nearly complete. Sports editor
Hayden Meikle looks at how a struggling franchise and a
slumping union hope to flourish by forging their own paths.
The wedding was rushed, the honeymoon was a little difficult,
the early years were gloriously successful and after that . .
. well, the less said about those years, the better.
And now, the end is near. Otago and the Highlanders, once
barely distinguishable from each other but now dysfunctional
partners in a faltering relationship, are to be cleft in
twain.
Sweeping changes revealed yesterday include the establishment
of a Highlanders management team that, for the first time,
will be formally and almost entirely separate from the Otago
Rugby Football Union.
A Highlanders general manager role has been created,
replacing the chief executive role held by ORFU boss Richard
Reid, and the new employees will be based away from
Carisbrook.
It is the most significant development in the history of the
Highlanders franchise, easily trumping the home final in
1999, the massive dispute between coach Laurie Mains and
players in 2003, and the decision to avoid the draft where
possible.
Why has it happened?
It all seemed so simple when New Zealand rugby joined the
professional era in 1995 and created five franchises to play
in the Super 12.
Those franchises were naturally established in the old "big
five" unions: Auckland, Waikato, Wellington, Canterbury and
Otago.
And it took some time for people to stop calling the
franchise teams by their provincial names, and for nicknames
like the Highlanders to catch on.
The franchises were dominated by the biggest of the unions
underneath. So the Blues were essentially Auckland, and the
Highlanders were very much just Otago with a token
Southlander or two tossed into the mix.
The host provincial unions were contracted by the New Zealand
Rugby Union, the 100% shareholder in the five teams, to run
the franchises. In the Highlanders' case, this was great for
Otago, because it could recruit new players simply by
dangling a Super 12 contract in front of them.
But fast forward a few years and the lustre has been stripped
right off the union-franchise arrangement, at least in
Highlanders country.
Both are struggling on the field, both are bleeding money (a
sort of salvage operation started this year, but millions of
dollars have disappeared in recent years) and both have a
public image that has suffered from years of battering.
Now, instead of seeing the link between Otago and the
Highlanders as an obvious and sensible thing, it is seen as a
drain on both. People are being forced to spread their
ability and attention over dual roles, resources are diluted,
and the ability of one team to get ahead is compromised by
the performance of the other.
Perhaps the single biggest reason the split has emerged now
is the expansion of the Super competition.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.