If a tree falls in the forest and no-one is there to hear it,
does it make a noise?
Nga Mamaku - the Black Ferns - have fallen at the hands of
archrival England in a three-test series, with two losses and
a draw, and there hasn't been much of an uproar.
Herein lies the problem: despite the buzz created around the
Rugby World Cup, and the status of the "men's game" as our
national sport, not many New Zealanders care enough about
women's rugby to jump up and down and demand answers.
For followers of the Black Ferns, the pain of the 10-0 loss
in the first test and 21-7 loss in the second test was dulled
slightly by finishing the series with an 8-8 draw.
The draw however, wasn't enough to hide the fact this was the
first time the national side had experienced consecutive
losses, and the first time since 1991 the team had remained
scoreless in a test match.
Is this something to be concerned about? Is this a glitch or
a gaping sore?The performance of the Black Ferns against
England is a red flag to the players, team management and the
NZRU that resources allocated to women's rugby have reached a
critical level. And by resources, I'm referring to
leadership, as well as funding.
For the last few years, resources for the women's game have
been cut, redirected, rationalised, diverted, put on hold and
minimised, and yet the Black Ferns continued to win.
Just last year, the Black Ferns managed to win their pinnacle
event, beating England 13-10 in the Women's Rugby World Cup
final.
If the NZRU was wondering how little the women's game could
survive on, I think it has found it. The Black Ferns have hit
rock bottom and perhaps the outcome in England is a blessing
in disguise. Now, at least, we know how little we can get
away with before the team suffers.
In fairness to the NZRU, it has been a tough few years, and
the focus of resources and attention was on the Rugby World
Cup taking place in our own back yard.
Now that we've managed to win that in terms of putting on a
great tournament, creating a festival atmosphere and securing
the Webb Ellis Trophy, we can start to think about other
brands under the NZRU umbrella.
If the Black Ferns are the cream, the pavlova has been slowly
and surely flattening out for some time. Girls are playing
the game in droves in the form of rippa rugby, with 10,411
players in the database, and secondary schoolgirls rugby is
OK with 3606 players registered. At the senior level,
however, there are only 933 players registered playing club
and provincial rugby in New Zealand.
How are we meant to pick the cream from such a limited pool
of players? What is the solution?
Should we focus on getting more international games for elite
players or develop the base more?I believe we need to develop
the base again and in order to do this we need to promote
club rugby and get provincial union teams back on the agenda.
That is a big ask, however, when provincial unions are
struggling to sustain their men's ITM Cup teams. In a
nutshell, the NZRU needs to show the provinces that women's
rugby is a priority.
Although slow to leverage off the Olympics, there is now a
sevens campaign to be implemented from 2012, and the
guaranteed test matches against the English in 2012 and 2013
do offer an incentive for players to stay involved in the
game.
On top of that, provinces need help in the form of templates,
competitions, expertise and development opportunities to get
the infrastructure of women's rugby in New Zealand healthy
again.
The tree has fallen. I've heard it, and hopefully the NZRU
has, as well.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.