The Government would not endorse Contact Energy's intention
to promote building more hydro-electric dams on the Clutha
River, Energy Minister David Parker said in Alexandra
yesterday.
"I am confident we'll have alternatives which don't require
us to dam even more of our ever-dwindling number of
unmodified rivers."
Mr Parker added the Government would not bow to pressure from
Contact to change the Resource Management Act to make it
easier to develop such projects.
But Contact said yesterday that if its investigations
"stacked up", then it was hoped one or all of four schemes
being considered - Beaumont, Luggate, Queensberry and a power
station at the Hawea dam - could be "advanced in some form"
by 2015.
Contact's plans to dust off Clutha River projects were
revealed in last Saturday's Otago Daily Times, prompting its
chief executive, David Baldwin, to confirm in a radio
interview yesterday his company was thinking beyond
geothermal and wind generation.
"If we were to think about hydro, as we think about
geo-thermal today, as an alternative to, say, natural gas -
particularly when you have to import that natural gas - then
hydro may be an option that's more palatable than it has been
over the last five to 10 or 20 years or so," he said.
Mr Baldwin could not be contacted by the ODT and
communications manager Jonathan Hill appeared to distance
himself from those comments by saying the company had made no
commitment to building any dams.
While Contact had its plate full now with geothermal and wind
generation projects, it also needed to look at other options
like hydro-electricity in the coming few years, Mr Hill said.
"If we saw a project that stacked up and was feasible and
viable, we might be looking to advance it in some form by the
middle of next decade . . .
"I don't want to blow this out of proportion. All we're doing
is dusting off some old plans . . ."
Reviewing the three Clutha schemes was very much a long-term
move, Mr Hill said.
It would be concentrating on its geo-thermal and wind
developments for the next few years and had $3 billion tied
up in projects which were at various stages.
Contact has already secured resource consent for a 16MW
scheme on the Hawea dam and its board will meet soon to
consider giving that project the final investment tick.
But Mr Parker, in Alexandra yesterday to give a lecture on
climate change, said he did not want to see further damming
of rivers in Otago, or throughout New Zealand, particularly
where a renewable energy alternative such as wind energy or
geo-thermal power was available.
The Government's priority for new energy generation was with
projects which had the most reversible environmental impact,
which was a difficult concept in terms of hydro generation.
"The environmental effects of geothermal power generation are
easy to reverse, wind is in the middle, and hydro is at the
bottom. We don't need to dam the rest of our rivers," he
said.
Mr Parker said Contact had approached the Government about
the possibility of changes being made to the RMA, which would
enable new large-scale hydro energy generation to be more
easily developed.
"Contact said this morning the Government would need to
intervene and change the RMA. Essentially, what they are
saying is we should lower the environmental hurdle provided
by the RMA.
"We are not planning to change the RMA to make it easier to
develop major hydro projects."
Mr Parker promised Central Otago would not experience the
likes of another Clyde dam project as long as Labour was in
power.
"Under the Labour Government, and in terms of Otago, you have
my absolute promise that we will never do what the National
government did in view of the Clyde dam. That's a promise so
strongly held within the Government - we would never do it,"
he said.
National Party leader John Key, questioned yesterday about
Contact's renewed interest in Clutha River power projects,
said the party would need to look at each proposal,
particularly as new hydro dams would have an impact on the
communities of Luggate, Queensberry and Beaumont.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.