The Minister of
Conservation, Tim Groser, will not stand in the way of a
proposed hydro-electric development on the Nevis River.
The Nevis River water conservation order hearing was told in
Cromwell yesterday the Department of Conservation's deal with
dam developer Pioneer Generation meant that if the power
company gained all the other consents it needed for a dam,
the Minister of Conservation would also give consent.
Doc's Otago conservator, Jeff Connell, giving evidence on
behalf of the Director-general of Conservation, said Pioneer
Generation owned the Craigroy and Ben Nevis pastoral leases,
giving it control over the land it needed to proceed with the
development, and was presently going through the tenure
review programme.
Mr Connell said allowance was made for the power company's
plans in the agreement.
The tribunal has been considering an application by the New
Zealand and Otago Fish and Game Councils to amend the Nevis
River Water Conservation Order, so damming the river or
diverting water are banned.
The proposal attracted 248 submissions, most in favour of
prohibiting dams.
Mr Connell said if tenure review became a "done deal", as he
was confident it would, the agreement would include details
of the hydro development proposal for the minister's consent.
In considering the plan, the minister would not "prohibit"
the dam or dams but could impose conditions to avoid, remedy
or mitigate its adverse effects on the values identified in
the landscape protection covenant.
Under the tenure review programme, more than half the land -
10,800ha - would return to the Crown as public conservation
land and the rest would be freeholded, subject to a range of
protective covenants and access easements.
"If tenure review goes ahead and Pioneer gets all the other
consents it needs for the hydro development, the minister can
effectively move the [landscape protection] covenants off to
one side," Mr Connell said.
Under the agreement, the minister would be contractually
obliged to approve the development.
If Pioneer did not get the other consents needed to proceed
with the dam, the covenants on the property would remain in
force.
The hydro proposal had not been finalised but was likely to
result in two new lakes in the valley - one about the size of
Lake Hayes and one smaller, he said.
Doc presented evidence at the original water conservation
order hearing in 1991 and the existing order did not ban dams
on the river.
That aspect of the order was not appealed, Mr Connell said.
If the dam was built, the landscape values of the area, rare
plants and threatened ecosystems within the dam's footprint
would be protected under the tenure review proposal, he said.
Day 7
Tribunal: Richard Fowler (chairman), Carolyn Burns and
Rauru Kirikiri.
Application: To amend the existing Water Conservation
Order to prevent damming or diversion of the Nevis River.
Players: New Zealand and Otago Fish and Game Councils
want the changes, Pioneer Generation and TrustPower among
those in opposition.
Yesterday: Evidence heard from Ted and Mereana Loose;
Otago Conservator of the Department of Conservation, Jeff
Connell; New Zealand Historic Places Trust witnesses Matthew
Schmidt, Heather Bauchop and Doug Bray.
Quote of the day: "It is important that we allow
rivers to behave in a natural state; that they are allowed to
flood, to cleanse debris and sediment from their system.
Not enough attention has been paid in the past to effects
that damming can cause" - Ted Loose, of Te Anau.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.