'Prescribe less' plea to doctors

Errol MillarA letter urging Otago and Southland general practitioners to show restraint when prescribing medicines - in a move to save money - should be retracted, the New Zealand Pharmacy Guild says.

Guild chief executive Annabel Young said the letter sent to GPs by the Otago and Southland district health boards was "flying in the face" of part of last year's national agreement between boards and the guild.

Otago board chairman Errol Millar, who came up with the idea of the letter, said that was Ms Young's interpretation and he would not want "bureaucracy to get in the road of common sense".

The letter is signed by Mr Millar, Southland board chairman Paul Menzies, Primary Health Organisation Transition Board chairman Conway Powell and South Link Health executive director Prof Murray Tilyard (who also chairs the transition board's clinical health services subcommittee).

Headed "Cost of Community Pharmaceuticals", it says it is a personal appeal to GPs to help the boards, which are under "tremendous financial pressure".

The boards were spending an average $261.94 per patient in this area, $7.24 above the national average.

This variance accounted for $2.071 million of the total spending on community medicines in the two provinces last financial year of almost $80 million.

The letter recognised good work done by South Link Health and the Best Practice Advocacy Centre on prescribing practice, as shown by the regions' better use of cheaper, equivalent generic brands. However, it added the boards "simply cannot afford our current and projected pharmaceutical costs".

The variation in pharmaceutical prescribing practice appeared to be beyond that which could be explained by the variation in individual patient need, although it was accepted some GPs would have a higher than average prescription cost due to their mix of patients.

The letter says if the boards cannot bring medicine spending into line with funding, there would be no alternative but to reduce some other much-needed service.

"Our plea to you is to please help us to ensure we retain our services to the community by exercising prescribing restraint where possible," the letter ended.

Mr Millar said he had received no feedback from GPs since the letter went out a week ago.

The board did not want doctors to cut corners to save money and the wording of the letter had been very careful, he said.

Boards chief executive Brian Rousseau said the letter was not saying GPs were not doing their job, just asking them to be aware of the financial situation when they were writing prescriptions.

Prof Tilyard said feedback to him from GPs had been positive. It was good to be reminded that prescribing was a key area of expenditure and of the need to minimise waste.

Ms Young said community pharmacies had agreed to accept no increase in the $5.30 dispensing fee in the new agreement which came into effect this week.

One of the conditions for this was that boards would not intervene to lower forecast growth rates in the dispensing volumes during the term of the agreement, which expires in August next year.

Prescibe less

Seems like doctors have been asked to prescribe 'Claytons' pharmaceuticals because although they may be less effective they are much cheaper. 'Generic' prescribing means rather than using a proven effective drug developed by a recognised pharmaceutical manufacturer; they should use a substitute drug from a lesser recognised manufacturer. Chances are that the cheaper one will work albeit over a longer time than the one developed by a major international company; so your infection etc. will be cured in four weeks instead of two. As I understand it, generic pharmaceuticals are not produced by mainline companies as opposed to 'Brand name' products. eg. Your whisky is made in 3rd world countries rather than Scotland. eg. Erythromycin [antibiotic] is available as the 'estolate' or the 'stearate'. Both will work but the estolate is more potent/effective than the stearate or even the 'base' Not only will the elderly be deprived of their home help; when they become sick their recovery will take twice as long because their local GP is being encouraged to limit his prescribing within pecuniary boundaries rather than effective therapeutics. Otago DHB seems to be advocating price rather than 'best practice.'

Drugs

Interesting. The generic drugs (despite Pharmac's assertion to the opposite) do not work on many people and only require about 30% of the original components in them to be sold as that drug. I have found difficulty with the withdrawal of pantapresole from the list, leaving me with generic varieties that don't work at all for the treatment of my hiatis hernia. Now they are asking GPs to stop (reduce) prescribing. Nobody seems to consider that it is the govt budget for 'spending' on drugs and health care that needs revising to a healthy level that covers the cost of the publics need, not the attempt to stop the public from needing it that is at issue here. This govt has no trouble spending on ministerial needs. There is a fund for overseas aid. There are defence budgets. Money was wasted on Clinton's cancelled visit here for instance. But these are luxuries we can afford to forego if we are to die from lack of health care. Get real and increase the funding to realistic levels to cover the requirements of our population and stop this cost cutting exercise. Its priorities that need assessing. Its what the govt spends our money on that needs addressing.

Bravo Errol Millar

Well put Errol Millar. Doctors should remember they are not salesmen for pharmaceutical companies ......we do not want to go the way of the USA where their elderly are taking sometimes up to 22 pills a day. More doctoring less pharmaceuticals.