Board members supporting Thomson

Richard Thomson
Richard Thomson
The Otago District Health Board has rallied in support of its chairman, Richard Thomson, with many members saying it would be a huge loss for Otago if he was sacked.

Health Minister Tony Ryall has written to Mr Thomson and the board telling them he has lost confidence in Mr Thomson's leadership following the significant defrauding of the board and is considering removing him as chairman.

Board members spoken to by the Otago Daily Times yesterday expressed their dismay at the way the situation was unfolding, saying it would be unfair if Mr Thomson was sacked.

Many spoke of his hard work, integrity and experience in the health sector and had "total" and "absolute" confidence in his leadership.

Malcolm Macpherson said the only justification he could see for sacking Mr Thomson was the Westminster convention - "if something happens on your watch, you are accountable" - but nobody anywhere in New Zealand was held to those standards, even ministers.

"In my experience in local government and the health sector, which goes back more than 20 years, Richard Thomson has been the best chair I have worked with.

If he goes, it will be a real loss to this district health board and to the sector, nationally."Dr Branko Sijnja said the fraud, perpetrated by the board's former chief information officer, Michael Swann, and his friend, Kerry Harford, was in place "well before Richard was even in the picture".

"I believe he [Mr Thomson] did exactly the right things and it was handled well from when [the fraud] was discovered.

"The person who committed [the fraud] is before the courts and will face his punishment in due time. You don't normally penalise the person who has been robbed."

Louise Rosson said it was because of Mr Thomson's actions, once he learned about the fraud allegations, that the criminal justice system took over.

"There is nothing he could have done that he didn't do."Errol Millar said he believed the issue had become "rather a distraction" and needed to be resolved sooner rather than later, so the board could get on with what it should be doing.

"In the scheme of things, ultimately the minister is the boss, so whatever the minister decides to do, he will do."