Shareholders need to have an agreement at the start

If you’re starting or running a business with other co-founders, you’ve probably been told by someone to get a shareholders agreement.

But why is this important? What does a shareholders agreement do? What can happen if you don’t get one? In this article, I’ll explain why you need to have some hard conversations with co-founders, and well look at an interesting recent case with costly consequences.

What is a shareholders agreement?

A shareholders agreement is a contract where you agree how you’re going to work together to run your business. Think of it like the ground rules for your business. Such an agreement can cover things such as. —

Ownership: What each person brings to the table, and what portion of the business each person gets in return.

Shares: How each person can deal with their shares, and how the company can issue more shares.

Decisions: How directors are appointed, and whether there are any decisions that require specific approvals.

Exit: What happens if someone leaves the business, and whether they get to keep their shares (e.g. vesting).

There is no one-size-fits-all solution to any of these points. Each business is different, and each founder is different. So its really helpful to agree on the rules that should apply early on, and review them as your business grows and changes.

Why should you talk through the issues early on?

It’s kind of like a pre-nuptial agreement before you get married. If you can’t have a sensible discussion with your significant other around things like money and what happens if you break up, then that might be a bit of a red flag.

I’ve seen businesses where the founders keep putting off a shareholders agreement, as it’s just "too hard" or "not a priority". If the business then fails, a messy end becomes even messier.

However, even if those businesses had survived, they may still have had problems. By not laying the groundwork for how the business will run right at the start, you can potentially face large costs and lost opportunities down the line.

What if you don’t want a shareholders agreement?

It can be a bit daunting to engage with a lawyer in the early days of your business. There is also a cost to getting a shareholders agreement drafted. Depending on the lawyer, it is probably at least a few thousand dollars, or more. So, what can you do if you just can’t afford the expense?

Well, the minimum effort here is really to talk through the issues with your co-founders. If issues arise, having nothing written down will make life more difficult.

But if you have talked through the key issues, this should hopefully help avoid the risk of any problems arising or allow you to work through problems before they become too big. If your business grows, then the problems can indeed become very big!

What can happen when things go wrong?

In one recent case, the majority owners of a business were missing a key clause in their shareholders agreement. As a result, they had to pay an extra $2million to the minority shareholder when they sold the business. How did this happen?

The majority shareholders (Dold and Jacobs) had agreed to sell the business for $A112million. They then asked the minority shareholder (Murphy) to confirm his earlier approval of the sale, but Murphy wanted more money. He demanded $2million extra for the deal to go ahead, even though he only held 6% of the company.

Unfortunately for Dold and Jacobs, Murphy was perfectly entitled to hold out for a better deal. So when Dold and Jacobs paid him, the court said he was entitled to keep that extra money (even though some people might think that sounds like extortion). There is a bit more detail to the case, but the point here is (in theory) a more appropriate shareholders agreement could have prevented the drama.

What could they have done differently?

In principle, the shareholders could have agreed to include a "drag-along" provision in their shareholders agreement. A drag-along provision would have required Murphy to sell his shares (at the same price as Dold and Jacobs). Murphy would still have received a substantial payout, but he would not have had the leverage to hold up the entire sale for an extra fee.

In this case, there may also have been an underlying issue around whether Murphy deserved more shares based on how much work he had put in. Trying to negotiate a shareholders agreement earlier on may have allowed that issue to be resolved before it turned into a larger problem.

All in all, this is a timely reminder to sort out the ground rules for how you will work with your other shareholders — before it’s too late.

 - Wade Pearson is a senior solicitor in the commercial team at law firm Gallaway Cook Allan. This article is general in nature, so do not use it as a substitute for legal advice.


Add a Comment






Our journalists are your neighbours

We are the South's eyes and ears in crucial council meetings, at court hearings, on the sidelines of sporting events and on the frontline of breaking news.

As our region faces uncharted waters in the wake of a global pandemic, Otago Daily Times continues to bring you local stories that matter.

We employ local journalists and photographers to tell your stories, as other outlets cut local coverage in favour of stories told out of Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch.

You can help us continue to bring you local news you can trust by becoming a supporter.

Become a Supporter