Comment permalink

Landlords say their tenants were affected by excessive noise from the Dog With Two Tails cafe and...
Landlords say their tenants were affected by excessive noise from the Dog With Two Tails cafe and bar’s music space Bark! Photo: Linda Robertson
Owners of apartments in central Dunedin say it was irresponsible of the city council to allow a live music venue to be set up next door without requiring sound mitigation.

Kaiapoi House landlords Wayne and Billee Marsh said their tenants were affected by excessive noise from the Dog With Two Tails cafe and bar’s music space Bark! in Moray Pl.

The process for dealing with that was a shambles and, in an enclave of residential properties, conflict about amplified music seemed inevitable, they said.

People on the other side of the argument, music fans, agree noise-management policies are deficient. They have started a petition calling for protections for venues, artists and entertainers to be built into regulations governing Dunedin’s commercial areas.

The petition had attracted almost 1000 signatures by yesterday evening and accompanying material argued the system was complaints-driven and "destructive to the vibrancy and creativity of the city, making the staging of live events a Russian roulette with very real consequences to venues and artists alike".

The Dunedin City Council conceded noise control was largely subjective, but that was not entirely down to council policy.

"The requirement to manage excessive noise is not set by council policy but by central government, through the Resource Management Act, which offers only subjective assessment criteria," a council spokesman said.

"Businesses are required to comply with this legislation and the council to take steps where non-compliance is identified, but we also endeavour to work with all parties to address noise issues."

The council indicated a meeting could be held with the cafe owner and other parties to discuss a way forward.

Dog With Two Tails owner Michael Wilson said he had looked into installing sound dampening, but it could cost about $20,000 and he wanted to be sure it would work.

People who chose to live in the inner city should expect to encounter some noise there and music benefited people’s mental health, he said.

Mrs Marsh said the handling of noise complaints had been flawed.

Failure to follow procedure had then hindered efforts to prove remediation was needed, she said.

The Kaiapoi House apartments were developed in 2003.

Tenants were affected by noise travelling through the bluestone wall of Bark! and through triple-brick walls into their living area, Mrs Marsh said.

"At times, they can even hear the words of the songs.

"We also have an apartment and have made complaints when experiencing excessive noise.

"This quarter of Moray Pl needs to be recognised and valued by council as a residential enclave and policy needs to reflect support and protection."

Vibrancy should not be confused with vibrating, excessive noise, she said.

The council spokesman said noise limits were set under the council’s second-generation district plan, but the Resource Management Act would still have to be used to enforce a breach of a reasonable noise level.

"Noise control uses a range of criteria to assess noise, including perceived loudness, bass levels and the time of day or night."

Dunedin Mayor Aaron Hawkins said the council wanted to both encourage inner-city living and fulfil its obligations as a regulator.

He wanted the city to be supportive of its creative community, rather than stifle it.

Mr Hawkins suggested the council could help artists and venues overcome challenges.

"It would be a sad day if we couldn’t host folk gigs in the centre of town."

grant.miller@odt.co.nz

Comments

Well the tennants chose to live in the apartments, it's rather like moving next door to an airport and complaining about the noise.

You've moved to the middle of town and you're complaining about the noise? Unreal...

It's down to the original developer and the people who have bought the apartments. They knew darned well that Dunedin city has a very vibrant night life that includes multiple venues hosting bands. You can't then expect to reside in the middle of the city, with all those conveniences on one hand, yet expect to live quietly.
I don't see this as a council issue. Like the previous comments from Nivaman and DB, if you buy a house next to the airport/motorway/train tracks/speedway etc, it will be noisy. It's up to the developer/builder to mitigate the potential for excessive noise, and the buyer should have every expectation that a city centre will at times produce noise.
Yes, the council is trying to promote people to live in the inner city, but it comes at a price.
Leave the city centre with its vibrancy, and character - we have enough suppression and regulation without ripping the guts out of Dunedin's night life.

 

Advertisement

Our journalists are your neighbours

We are the South's eyes and ears in crucial council meetings, at court hearings, on the sidelines of sporting events and on the frontline of breaking news.

As our region faces uncharted waters in the wake of a global pandemic, Otago Daily Times continues to bring you local stories that matter.

We employ local journalists and photographers to tell your stories, as other outlets cut local coverage in favour of stories told out of Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch.

You can help us continue to bring you local news you can trust by becoming a supporter.

Become a Supporter