Comment permalink

Migrants will need to earn more than $49,000 to qualify for a highly-skilled worker visa under changes slammed as tinkering by New Zealand First and Labour.

Immigration Minister Michael Woodhouse announced the changes today, saying they are aimed at increasing the quality of people coming to New Zealand.

Winston Peters
Winston Peters

New Zealand First leader Winston Peters immediately attacked the policy as "tinkering" and "just a dog whistle to show they're doing something".

Labour leader Andrew Little also labelled the changes tinkering, and said public services, housing and infrastructure couldn't keep up with record migration levels.

"We need to take a breather and catch up...this is a typical Bill English move. No vision, no leadership, no fix for the problem."

But Mr Woodhouse told a Queenstown audience that significant cuts to migration numbers wouldn't be wise with the regions "screaming out for more workers".

"You will have heard me talk about the barriers to employment that exist for some New Zealanders - location, skills, training, attitude, drugs and alcohol.

"We don't give up on them...but in the meantime, the fruit needs to be picked, the grapes harvested and employers need the workers to do those jobs."

Two salary thresholds will be introduced after consultation:

 • One will be set at the New Zealand median income, about $49,000 per year. Anyone earning less will no longer be classified as highly-skilled, and permanent residence applicants will no longer be able to claim points for jobs that are paid below the median income.

 • The other threshold will be set at 1.5 times the New Zealand median income of $73,299 a year for jobs that are not considered skilled but are well paid. Anyone earning more will automatically be classified as highly skilled.

Permanent residence applicants will be allowed to claim points for jobs that are not considered skilled, but are paid above the higher threshold.

"Introducing these thresholds is about creating a balance. A balance between ensuring employers can meet genuine labour shortages by using people from overseas, while at the same time ensuring those lower skilled migrants are coming here with a clear understanding of their visa conditions," Mr Woodhouse said.

"In fact, there will be some workers who are now likely to be eligible for residence for the first time such as outdoor adventure instructors, heavy machinery operators and experienced workers in the construction and oil and gas industry."

Mr Woodhouse said the SMC points table, under which individuals claim points towards their residence application, will also be realigned to "put more emphasis on characteristics associated with better outcomes for migrants".

Other changes to temporary migration settings include:

 • A new maximum duration of three years for lower-skilled and lower-paid Essential Skills visa holders, after which a minimum stand-down period will apply before getting another lower-skilled temporary work visa.

 • Toughening up requirements for the partners and children of these visa holders. They can obtain work visas and student visas allowing them to attend school in New Zealand as domestic students. Under the changes, partners and children will be classified as visitors and only gain a work visa if they meet visa requirements in their own right.

 • Ensuring the length of the visa in seasonal occupations aligns with peak labour demand, rather than for 12 months as is presently the case.

Mr Woodhouse said about 4000 migrant workers and their families who have lived in the South Island for more than five years will be given a one-off pathway to residence.

Andrew Little
Andrew Little

Mr Little said Labour would go much further than today's changes and introduce a "fresh approach" to immigration that will reduce overall numbers, stop "rorts" that allow low-skilled people to get residency, and increase the skills of new arrivals.

Mr Peters, who has long called for a significant cut to migration, said today's changes were more "tweaking".

"But in reality it's a callous attempt to hold on to power. They are taking note of their polls and realise Kiwis have had enough of the country being flooded with unskilled foreign workers.

"They are fiddling with the issue while the plain fact is foreign workers will still be able to come here when employers claim they can't get Kiwis. We have 139,000 Kiwis out of work and many are desperate to get a job."

Public consultation on the changes closes on 21 May, with implementation planned for later this year.

Key election issue

Record migration, which is underpinning New Zealand's economic growth and putting pressure on infrastructure, has shown no sign of letting up.

In the year to February, net migration rose to a record 71,333, of which 57,156 were bound for Auckland.

Immigration has become a key election issue with opposition parties promising to reduce new arrivals because of the effect on house prices and pressure on infrastructure including roading, schools and hospitals.

The Government has argued strong immigration flows are a measure of the country's success and contribute positively to the wider economy.

However, in October last year Mr Woodhouse announced changes that meant those coming to New Zealand under the skilled migrant category would need 160 points before getting residency, rather than 140.

The number of people allowed entry under the family category was also more than halved, and a temporary ban on applications under the parent category was also announced.

Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull on Tuesday announced an end to a visa programme for skilled migrants, as part of a bid to tackle unemployment.

Mr Turnbull said jobs needed to go to Australians first, before businesses could consider hiring foreign workers.

United States President Donald Trump this week signed a "buy American, hire American" executive order targeting the H-1B visa scheme that is particularly used by the tech sector.

Comments

Took a long time to wake up. But a weak attempt.

This isn't addressing the immigration issue at all, and the pretense of it being about addressing skill shortages is gone. Income doesn't dictate whether a skill in is short supply or not. This is simply a long held suspicion out in the open , "if you got the cash we got the paperwork".