Tony Blakely: Can we get off this Delta hell highway?

Australia in July unveiled a four-stage plan back to greater freedoms when the country reaches 70...
Australia in July unveiled a four-stage plan back to greater freedoms when the country reaches 70% to 80% vaccination levels. Photo: Getty Images
The Australian state of Victoria has ditched its Covid-19 elimination strategy as the way out of lockdown, instead looking to vaccinations.

But it's a super-slippery virus to control and, with the current toolkit, vaccination is the best way out. But it'll take time and is not a full solution, Melbourne-based Otago University epidemiologist Tony Blakely warns.

Delta is knocking us around. Big time. With the benefit of hindsight, Victoria did extremely well to re-eliminate Delta in lockdown 5.

Lockdown 6 is working in so far as keeping daily increases in cases to "only" 5 per cent; that daily increase would be a lot worse without lockdown. But this time around, we are not seeing our lockdown causing daily numbers to decrease.

Why?

First, this virus is super-slippery. Not only does an infected person infect more people on average than for previous variants, but an infected person becomes infectious as early as day 1 - it was perhaps day 3 for pre-Delta variants. This narrows the window of opportunity that contact tracing used to have - it is harder now with contact tracing to get infected contacts into isolation before they infect others.

Second, heterogeneity. Our society is diverse. The reproductive rate or R0 of Delta in a society like Australia is probably about 6.5 on average. But it varies - probably enormously - by sub-populations.

For example, in the "LGAs of concern" in Sydney and some western suburbs of Melbourne, due to the population mix including more young people, multi-generational households, more essential workers, more casualised workers, denser and closer social connections, and so on, the R0 is probably well above 6.5. That means the measures that might work for "R0 on average of 6.5" no longer work.

Heterogeneity is like having pockets of the bush super-dry and flammable. Not only does it make those pockets of the forest more likely to burn first in the next fire season, but the flames then spread out with an intensity to those areas where the fire might not have started per se.

Third, vaccines are great at preventing serious illness and death - but not as great as we would like to at dampening transmission. We absolutely must get vaccine coverage as high as possible. With our current toolkit, it is our best way out. But it will take time, and not be a full solution. Pfizer lowers your chance of being infected by 80 per cent and Astra-Zeneca by 60 per cent. Which - unfortunately - still sees a 20 and 40 per cent risk of getting infected even if vaccinated and passing on the virus.

This is why we will not achieve herd immunity through vaccination alone. We will need further measures. Like ongoing restrictions to work in concert with vaccines.

In Victoria now, given 120 cases yesterday, we do not have a good lid on this outbreak. Rather, daily cases are increasing by an average of over 5 per cent a day in the past 10 days. If this is the true effective reproductive rate of Delta in Victoria's current lockdown, then we might peak at 2000 cases a day in early November before increasing vaccine coverage caught up and turned the curve down. (Assumptions in my calculations include that the virus behaves according to average maths (which it is notorious for not doing), we maintain the restrictions we have now, and various assumptions about vaccines.)

Ten days ago, I prompted some public discussion about options if case numbers had not gone down by September 2. With a "moonshot" proposal whereby we could relax restrictions and "bridge over" to November with some increase in cases, but the curve being caught and turned by increasing vaccine coverage in late October and early November.

However, we now have increasing cases - there is little or no headroom to move to reduce restrictions.

Accordingly, and correctly, the Victorian government has taken a cautious approach. Very modest relaxation of restrictions. Such as opening playgrounds with new measures (no de-masking, QR codes), and a 10km radius in a few weeks.

I am sure you are sick of lockdown; I am. So, what gives me hope?

We need innovation. For example, a third mRNA vaccine dose to those who have received double dose AstraZeneca as soon as everyone has been initial dosed. There are good grounds to expect that an mRNA vaccine on top of AZ will see a substantial increase in vaccine performance, dampening transmission.

We also need to think innovatively about how we can change our society to drive down the reproductive rate of this virus. Markedly improving ventilation of buildings, like schools and office blocks, seems a really important avenue to explore - although that will not help us in the next two months.

Back to heterogeneity, we need to vaccinate first among populations that - through no fault of their own - have the conditions that the virus loves the most. Adding outreach vaccination clinics on top of mass vaccination hubs is important. And likewise, considering rolling out mass rapid antigen testing to people in high-risk populations could help - quickly.

 

 

Comments

Environment and structural changes, fine, but you have a serious problem with public non compliance, which is not addressed here.