
Fifteen countries in the Asia-Pacific region have signed the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) deal.
It's the world's largest free trade agreement, has been eight years in the making and came into fruition today via a virtual summit hosted in Hanoi, Vietnam.
The agreement encompasses Japan, China, South Korea, the 10 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Australia and New Zealand, creating a free trade zone, which covers nearly a third of the world's trade and economic output.
Leaders from all 15 countries watched via video as Ministers signed the deal: from Auckland, Trade Minister Damien O'Connor signed for New Zealand.
Speaking afterwards, he told reporters it would bring security and certainty to exporters.
One of the aims in coming years is to progressively lower tariffs across many areas.
The pact will take effect once enough participating countries ratify the agreement domestically within the next two years.
A major power, India pulled out last year, claiming its key concerns about agriculture and domestic industry were not being addressed.
Trade analyst Stephen Jacobi said India's absence is disappointing for all participating nations and India itself.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said RCEP remains a potential gamechanger for trade in the Asia-Pacific region.
Boost for China
Amid questions over the US's engagement in Asia, RCEP may cement China's position more firmly as an economic partner with Southeast Asia, Japan and Korea, putting the world's second-biggest economy in a better position to shape the region's trade rules.
The US is absent from both RCEP and the successor to former US president Barack Obama-led Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), leaving the world's biggest economy out of two trade groups that span the fastest-growing region on earth.
By contrast, RCEP could help Beijing cut its dependence on overseas markets and technology, a shift accelerated by a deepening rift with Washington, said Iris Pang, ING chief economist for Greater China.
RCEP will account for 30 percent of the global economy, 30 percent of the global population and reach 2.2 billion consumers, host Vietnam said today.
Group says treaty won't help NZ
But Edward Miller, from It's Our Future, fears New Zealanders won't benefit.
"We're seeing a huge secret agreement being negotiated where we don't know what the risks are and from the economic modelling that we've seen there's very little economic benefit to be gained.
"So we don't know why the government continues to do secret deals that are against our national interests."
Miller said there had been no effective public consultation over the deal, some parts of which attack New Zealand's national interests.
"The economic crisis that has come as a result of Covid is the biggest single economic event that we've had in New Zealand history.
"We need to preserve a policy space that will be able to ensure that we have a recovery that suits our people, our planet, our workers' rights etceteras. We can't guarantee that under RCEP."
Miller said It's Our Future would keep pushing the government to pull out of international trade deals.
- RNZ / Reuters
Comments
"It's Our Future" should be renamed "It's Our Past". Good grief, the undoubted benefits of international trade have been known for well over 200 years. It's like physics questioning Newton's law of gravity.
When 'trade deals' dictate what you can do domestically, it's no longer JUST a trade deal.
Trade is good but subscribing to globalist ideology does not support domestic industry but drives the wealth divide and social inequities within developed countries.
Being nice to globalist ideals does NOT equate to being nice to NZ or even the planet.
I would be interested in knowing what you mean by "dictate what you can do domestically". Trade deals have always incorporated elements of compulsion on how we do things domestically. The best example is the meat industry. They were compelled by their customers 50 years ago to basically rebuild their plants to bring them up to hygiene standards. They are still compelled to meet changing standards each year if they want to sell their meat. The latest elements of compulsion are around conservation and sustainability issues. If we do not meet the required standards we will not be selling our meat, or our dairy for that matter. Trade agreements Dictating "what you can do domestically" are not new they've always been part of the process.
And pray, tell us how globalist ideology doesn't support domestic industry and drives the wealth divide and social inequities. That sound like so much totally discredited Navorro misinformation. Stop presenting your flawed and discredited opinions as facts.
It seems that we're having free trade agreements, every two years for the last 30 years.
Yes. You're right and isn't it marvelous.
Ye shall reap what you sow.
If we're quoting the Bible, this one seems to fit the moment. God supports globalism.
Arise, shine, for your light has come, and the glory of the Lord has risen upon you. For behold, darkness shall cover the earth, and thick darkness the peoples; but the Lord will arise upon you, and his glory will be seen upon you. And nations shall come to your light, and kings to the brightness of your rising. Lift up your eyes all around, and see; they all gather together, they come to you; your sons shall come from afar, and your daughters shall be carried on the hip. Then you shall see and be radiant; your heart shall thrill and exult, because the abundance of the sea shall be turned to you, the wealth of the nations shall come to you.
China is not a good trading partner.. that one needs to be ditched immediately.
Wow! that's a fairly powerful statement. They clearly could have used your insight and knowledge on the treaty negotiating team. Just to be clear, my opening comments are sarcasm.
The evidence is weighed against you I'm afraid. NZ has had diplomatic relations with China since the Kirk Govt back in 1972. We began trading shortly thereafter. We have a long and successful trading relationship with China. Yes, there have been some hiccups along the way but these have been sorted as we go along and we have a strong and mutually beneficial history. This will only improve with the new treaty.
Unless you have some credible evidence to back up your highly dubious opinion?
It's a bit of a worry that we are signing agreements with China in the face of growing economic, political and military pressure. This will limit the New Zealand governments ability to put pressure on China when faced with rights abuses such as in Hong Kong and elsewhere. But as usual, a buck takes precedence over such matters.
The reality is that this treaty will provide protection for NZ in dispute circumstances.
You need to do a little more research and not make assumptions and make things up.











