
I am a Southerner who has been back in Dunedin for the past 13 years, after spending 25 years overseas in the North Island.
On arriving back, I soon realised the weather was a constant hot topic of conversation. What has puzzled me, however, are people’s short memories from one year to the next. I constantly hear phrases like "the winter is really long this year" or "spring is unusually cold", and so on. I’m forever responding "but it was like this last year", and the year before.
As a historian I’m fascinated by perceptions of time and the variability in people’s ability to remember back.
For me the past and present are continuous realities, but seemingly not for everyone.
And so it seems to be the case for the circumstances in which we currently find ourselves. I’m interested to note people now tend to talk about Covid-19 in the past tense. The commonly expressed sentiment is that it was something that happened back in March-May, and now it is gone again.
Perhaps this is particularly so for those of us who have had relatively little direct experience, or perhaps it is a factor of our geography — it is something far away, affecting other people.
But unfortunately that is not the case. Those who have recently returned from overseas will tell us that.
Those who have family or friends in other parts of the world will tell us that. Those who have suffered tragic loss or ill health within our borders will tell us that.
This thing is here now, it is here for the unforeseeable future, it is only a plane flight or a personal contact away, and so it should remain our constant concern.
I’m in this for the long haul (excuse the travel pun for those like me having "travel withdrawal"), and I have adopted the mindset that I still need to take this seriously. For that general reason I continue to wear a mask when on public transport or other contexts where it is prudent.
I know that it is no longer mandatory, but for me that is not the point. I think that there are bigger issues at stake. I am bothered that our collective inability to continue the practice reveals a worrying level of self-centredness and a generally short-sighted view of reality.
I wear a mask for safety reasons. In my mind that is a no-brainer, and it follows accepted and now very well-known public health advice. On a bus or plane, I’m not thinking primarily of my own health but that of others. I want to continue using public transport, so this is one of the "non-negotiables" that goes with that. But there are personal benefits too. I’m slightly immune compromised and usually pick up a good brace of colds each year. This year — none! Speaks for itself really.
I also wear a mask to embed a habit. A family member in the UK recently told us that when she goes out without her mask on she feels exposed. For her it is now the norm. Here, I’m the one who feels exposed as the only person sitting on a bus with a mask on. Travellers in Southeast Asia over the last decade or so will acknowledge that many communities have long adopted mask wearing as a public habit. Like many I went from "other people wear masks", to "who me?" to "OK, I better try this" to now feeling like it is natural. We have made it fun too. I have my work mask, my "books are great" mask, my "Morrison tartan"’ mask, and a reversible mask with Christmas images all ready for the festive season.
Habits take time and deliberation, but are surely worth the effort for the common good.
And as someone who has a somewhat global view on all this, I wear my mask out of solidarity, as a member of the human race. I wear a mask to honour those communities continuing to struggle with horrendous loss and difficulties. I wear a mask as a political statement, contrary to a certain soon-to-be-past world leader, to say that peoples’ lives matter. I wear a mask to acknowledge the losses, pain, suffering and ongoing challenges within our own community of Aotearoa New Zealand.
I wish mask wearing was still mandatory at Level 1, because it seems that only then will people do the right thing. While as a society we are good at complying with rules, sadly that indicates to me that we have not really "got it" in terms of the current pandemic and its long-term trajectory among us. Motivation should come from self-understanding, not external compulsion. So, I will continue to wear my mask as appropriate, in the hope that this will prompt others to do likewise.
- Hugh Morrison is an associate professor in the University of Otago College of Education, and writes on the history of religion and of childhood/youth.
Comments
I hope when he goes outside the sky will not fall on his head
It's people like you who will be responsible for aggravating any outbreak in the SI . Just because we have had a good run doesn't mean we always will . At one time Auckland , Australia and others thought the same as you. Some still do going by the lack of use of the covid app . At least this gentleman is taking a simple precaution that will help stop the spread in the case of an outbreak.
HE is taking a position. HIS position is not mine. HE can not impose HIS position on anybody. HIS position is no more informed than YOURS or MINE. WE are all born free. WE all have the right to live FREE. Imposing YOUR will on to ME limits MY right to be FREE. I was born FREE and will die FREE even if it's from COVID. FREEDOM is the most important right WE enjoy, without it life is not worth living.
@ Red Pill Part 2,
You say "Imposing YOUR will on to ME limits MY right to be FREE", how is refusing to mask up not Imposing YOUR will on to OTHERS and not limiting OTHER members of societies rights to be FREE to be healthy and do what they want, when not following basic precautions result in lockdowns. Having freedoms in a society does not mean being free to do whatever you please, it comes with responsibilities to others. That is why we have rules and laws and it is the constraints of those rules and laws that determine if a society is free.
You should read https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/, and point out where being required to wear a mask in a pandemic is a breach of you rights? Not wearing one however could be considered to breach article 1 and 3 as is not "in a spirit of brotherhood" and it endangers the "life and personal security" of others.
At least we have enough courage of our convictions that we use our real names and don't hide behind a pseudonym, which is just another mask anyway. Funny how you use one for anonymity and not the other recommended for heath reasons .
What you want is to take our freedom from us, people with alternative agendas have to mobilize some initial quorum of consent from the population. Mandatory masking seeks to build that consent. In addition to extending the fiction that we are in an emergency sufficient to trigger the extra-governmental authority of local and national executives, mandatory masking acts as a peer pressure-fueled signal that encourages conformity to our coming 'new normal." - "Mandatory Masks Aren't About Safety, They're About Social Control" You want to wear a mask and give up your rights, go ahead! But don't expect everybody else to. The author has a position, im not sure why you would think your position supercedes that?
Using your "logic" the government can take whatever actions it deems necessary to ensure we live healthy. You really want to do that? So the government decides to force people to wear condoms because it's "healthy"...the government decides people can't drink because it's not "healthy"...the government decides to forcibly give people vaccines. These actions by the government are all ok using your logic. These all infringe on an individuals right to be free. There is no logic in your position.
Actually for some reason Part one of my reply was published but here is the abridged version .
You say "There is no logic in your position" However that is incorrect. In fact quite the reverse.
Are you allowed to speed? Drink drive? Steal? Murder? Assault? Or break any number of other laws? By your argument you should be.
What activity that you could do before, can you not do with a mask on?
How does it infringe on your rights in an adverse way?
How is wearing masks about social control, especially when it's not compulsory?
Does it restrict your right free speech?
Or restrict you activities?
Or restrict your right to free and fair elections?
Or restrict your right to justice in a court of law?
Just how does it restrict you freedoms in any meaningful way , or contravene you rights under the UN human rights declaration, in any way that outweighs other peoples right to be healthy?
In fact by wearing a mask you are actually increasing your freedoms by helping to prevent lockdowns which restrict you far more.
Do you actually have have proof your freedoms and rights would be impinged?
Do you have any constructive input at all?
So far all I have heard is ranting.
There is no clear evidence that surgical masks protect members of the public from getting or passing on these sorts of infections because of incorrect use. For cloth masks worn by the public, the picture is even murkier. Surgical masks are made up of several layers of non-woven plastic and can effectively filter very small particles, such as droplets of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19). The masks typically contain an external waterproof layer and an internal absorbent layer. The question we need to ask is whether there are serious unintended consequences of recommending their widespread use by members of the public. To offer any protection, masks need to be worn correctly & consistently when in contact with other people. People touch their faces 15-23 times per hour. An itchy or poorly fitted mask may mean that people touch their eyes, nose and mouth even more regularly. After touching your mask, there’s a risk that your hands become contaminated, with the risk that you will then spread the virus to other surfaces, such as door handles, railings or tables. Using disposable masks daily would create significant environmental hazard, 42,000 tonnes unrecyclable waste.
Why do farmers mark sheep with paint? Be very careful signalling your submission.
A plague came down
like the wolf on the fold
And took the self centred
who just wouldn't be told
More rubbish from the lunatic fringe. The ODT publishes their each and every winge.
Red, it's a mere verse on current events, by a nonentity. It's the serious, like you, that cause unrest.
Who writes this crap in the ODT? You are immunity compromised and claim you are wearing a mask as a political statement? Rubbish! You're wearing the mask because you are desperately afraid of catching COVID. I don't care! I was born free and will continue to live free. Don't try and mandate mask-wearing for myself and others who want to live free? Wear your mask and leave the rest of us alone!
It won't be printed, but:
I disagree with Mr Morrrison. He is not protecting anyone. If he is not covid-positive, he cannot protect anyone by giving them something he hasn't got, just by wearing a thoroughly useless mask, which is really just the latest fashion statement.
There remains the covid; and if he or anyone else thinks a poorly fitting surgical mask will keep the covid out, well good luck with that. It's about control, not safety.











