Comment permalink

PHOTO: ODT FILES
The government intervened to get the smelter to delay its shutdown until late 2024. PHOTO: ODT FILES
The government tried to get Tiwai Point aluminium smelter to clean up toxic waste at its Southland site but failed.

Environment Minister David Parker admitted this today in slamming New Zealand Aluminium Smelters, saying he was "incredibly frustrated" at the "uncooperative" company.

RNZ yesterday revealed the smelter at Bluff has stockpiled 106,000 tonnes of cyanide-laced hazardous waste less than 100 metres from a fast-eroding beach.

"I think it's terrible that a major corporate ... have not to date been open as to the state of the site," Parker told Morning Report.

The government intervened to get the smelter to delay its shutdown until late 2024.

"We tried," Parker said.

"In the end, that was an agreement between the smelter and [power company] Meridian, the government wasn't involved.

"They wanted us to get involved in respect of [electricity] transmission pricing.

"We said: 'Well, we might be up for that if you promise to clean up the site and tell us the state of the site.

"They wouldn't. So that didn't advance."

New Zealand Aluminium Smelters has been approached for a comment.

The government had no power to intervene directly, so had given $300,000 to the regional council, which did have the power, under the Resource Management Act.

"They've got the power of entry onto the site. So I've asked them to go onto the site," the minister said.

"And I think they need to drill a few holes.

"I'm determined to get to the bottom of it."

Parker had put the Rio Tinto majority-owned smelter company on notice, he said.

The Environment Ministry said it had been engaging with the smelter since last September on how it would address its waste situation.

The tonnes of waste stockpiled by the beach at Tiwai Point - the residue of the lining inside the pots used to make aluminium, called spent cell liner waste, or SCL, or spent pot liner, SPL - are officially categorised as "hazardous waste", and some has been exported for disposal.

Workers handling it can be exposed to fluorides, crystalline silica, fluoride and beryllium, according to the International aluminium industry guidelines on SCL.

WorkSafe to assess smelter's compliance

Workplace safety regulator WorkSafe said it would be assessing the smelter's compliance with the Hazardous Substances storage requirements.

Its last workplace assessment was in February 2015, before the new and stricter Health and Safety at Work laws came in in 2016.

"This assessment included the storage of SPL on-site and no actionable issues were identified during this assessment," Worksafe said.

The smelter also had to comply when storing the waste with laws on hazardous substances, and with dangerous goods transport rules enforced by police.

The international SCL guidelines had no legal standing in New Zealand, WorkSafe said.

Invercargill City Council said, when updating its district plan, that planning approvals given to the smelter in the 1960s gave it "the right to operate virtually unconstrained by land-use conditions".

"The reality of this situation is reflected in the present zoning."

The city council sought a compromise between these rights, and the need to now address the land-use effects of the smelter's closure. It settled in the new district plan on encouraging the site's rehabilitation.

Toxic waste in Northland

And it was not alone, citing Sustainable Solvents in Northland.

"They brought all these solvents onto a site, they took the money to clean them up, they pocketed the money.

"And then they left behind this toxic waste site, which is a fire risk and we're having to spend a couple of million dollars ... to clean up the site. I think it's not good enough."

The Whangārei District Council has said it was trying to recover the costs from the company, for testing and disposing of 4000 drums of chemicals.

Comments

No wonder they decided to stay longer... A discounted power price deal, a loyal compliate workforce, a local council completely toothless and unaware of what is going on on-site, little or no real environmental monitoring, no work safe site visits since 2015, no requirement to provide regular and public reporting to its operations and a government who has now omitted they're been blind to the every increasing stockpiles of waste accumulating in the big shed out the back... All good here, nothing to see... and dont show them what's in the shed Barry! Its time, we as country, woke up to the fact that a lot of these big corporates have no interest in our environmental values.

Agreed. This is totally scandalous. It is simply not good enough that they all just shrug their shoulders and say it's not my fault. They need to get together and resolve this issue immediately.

And yet again we see how useless Worksafe are, fire the lot and get an organization that will do its job, not fly round the country attending meetings and eating a free lunch

No work safe site visits since 2015 - the year prior to stricter enforcements coming into law -says it all about these government organisations and councils. Locals can pay - they can pay rates and taxes to address and clean-up; they can pay the environmental costs on-going as they may be for generations; they can pay individual health problems that may consequentially arise and also keep paying the local Council and central Government to be bodies of little action, but large on talk and take.