Council slammed over George St 10kmh plan

The latest traffic flow proposal for Dunedin’s city centre has been labelled a unilateral, ad hoc push towards pedestrianisation, as a tranche of Dunedin city councillors call for better consultation.

The plan for George St and the central business district, dubbed ‘‘Safer CBD Streets — Covid-19 response’’ will go before today’s Dunedin City Council planning and environment committee.

However, the majority of councillors who responded to a request for comment by the Otago Daily Times yesterday said they did not have enough data to make an informed decision on the plan to allow pedestrians space to maintain physical distancing in the city centre.

Dunedin city councillor Jules Radich says consulatation was lacking in a proposal to slow...
Dunedin city councillor Jules Radich says consulatation was lacking in a proposal to slow vehicles to 10kmh in George St. PHOTO: STEPHEN JAQUIERY
The proposal calls for temporary wider footpaths, 10kmh speed limits, speed bumps, increased waits at traffic lights, and a journey along George St that council documents describe as potentially ‘‘unpleasant’’ enough to warrant rerouting buses.

Cr Andrew Whiley said public consultation was lacking and that was a ‘‘vital ingredient’’ in his initial support for the proposal.

He questioned how the plan could be produced by the city council when it could not produce a report on the last trial that disrupted traffic through the Octagon earlier this year.

‘‘We haven’t received any information about the Octagon [closure] success or failure ... but now we’re able to get this report done and presented to us in a matter of, what, 10 days?

‘‘We’re talking about people’s livelihoods here. We’re talking about people’s businesses. We’re talking jobs. We’re talking our economy.

‘‘I would think this is not the time for council to be making ad hoc motions and decisions when we’re coming out of lockdown.’’

Cr Sophie Barker said she, too, wanted to see the results from the pre-Covid-19 Octagon Experience before making a decision, as did Cr Carmen Houlahan, who also said she was not satisfied with the council’s promised consultation.

Cr Jules Radich went further and said he had ‘‘no faith’’ in the council’s consultation.

He conducted his own survey yesterday, finding universal opposition to the new proposal.

The proposal could create ‘‘wide-ranging instability’’ when the opposite was needed, Cr Lee Vandervis said.

Only Cr Steve Walker defended the proposed measures, saying he saw ‘‘great merit in many parts of the proposal’’.

George St retailer David Bridgman, of Bridgman Eyecare, said yesterday he had yet to be consulted on the proposal and was concerned ‘‘it’s going to have the opposite effect to what they want’’.

Former city councillor and Golden Centre Mall Acquisitions Dunedin owner Richard Thomson said ‘‘rather than just listening to retailers’ reactionary moaning’’ it could take a couple of years to get the right plan in place for customers, who should be prioritised.

AA Otago district council chairman Malcolm Budd said considering reducing the speed limit on George St to 10kmh, pushing towards pedestrianising it, and rerouting the public transport off George St was ‘‘a shock’’.

Otago Regional Council transport manager Garry Maloney did not answer whether he was in agreement with the suggested rerouting of buses from George St directly but said he was ‘‘given a heads-up last week’’ on the proposal and ‘‘rerouting of buses will be explored’’ if required.

Comments

View all

Public consultation is protected by law and all submissions must be archived. So anyone can check up on them. The DCC is legally obliged to take public consultation into account. If you hear any elected rep say anything like, "People have told us that this is what they want ..." then the chances are that what you are REALLY hearing is what that elected rep wants. Check the archives/original data to find out.

The DCC is only following the example of our government. After the Christchurch Mosque shooting, they rushed through gun laws without consultation. And more recently, they have given Police authority to enter a private home without a warrant, if it pertains to a flu-virus lock down. Again, without discussion.

So, why should the DCC be any different?! Consultation is now a thing of the past. Just accept that your view/opinion/concern counts for nothing... We should just sit back and allow those in power to decide everything for us!

The Market decides. The Market is customers, who can shop on George Street, or not, according to their view on Covid related safety, or lack of it.

The Dunedin Undemocratic Non Council of Elitists (DUNCE) need to pull their head out of the sand. This is no time to force their pet policies down people's throats knowing full well that there would be major concerns from the CBD business sector.
If spacing is an issue, then make the footpaths one way like was done in the supermarkets. They stayed open with no community spread of the virus.
Encouraging the belligerent to wander all over the road in the name of safety is to support anarchy.

If it isnt broke dont try and fix it! But then hey... if you want to discourage people driving into the city to do business then by all means put in speed humps, increase waiting time at traffic lights and reroute the buses away from george street and make it impossible to drive from one end of the city to the other.

Green idealogues are capitalising on this hyped up pandemic crisis in order push through their ideological agenda whilst further running our economy and our livelihoods in to the ground!

Gleeful will be my countenance when a certain "mayor" is voted out and a proper mayor is voted in.

I like to park reasonably close to where I shop and I think most people do. I certainly don't like walking too far carrying loads of shopping so closing George street and making less parking spots available means I will not be shopping in the CBD ever.

View all

 

Advertisement