Prime Minister Bill English is being urged to give voters some certainty about whether he plans to change superannuation eligibility.
Other political parties say Mr English is wrong to be considering changes, or that he needs to be more up-front about what those changes could be.
Speaking to Three's The Nation yesterday, Mr English said he had not made the same undertaking as his predecessor John Key not to tighten Super eligibility, "so we have the opportunity for a bit of a reset there".
He would not go into more detail, except to the Government was "working through the long term affordability" and that voters would know about the his intentions ahead of the general election on September 23.
New Zealand First leader Winston Peters said Mr English was the latest to make "alarming noises" about the affordability of the New Zealand Super.
Mr English was proposing changes to Super "without one economic fact at all to back it up", he said.
With a net GDP cost of 3.8%, New Zealand Super was relatively affordable, he said. The OECD average is 7% of GDP.
Mr Peters said New Zealanders were being "railroaded" into thinking that Super was unaffordable.
Labour leader Andrew Little said English needed to "come clean" about whether he planned to raise the entitlement age of 65.
His talk about a "reset" would set off alarm bells for Kiwi households, he said.
In 2015, Little questioned the fairness of giving a pension to wealthy people or those who were still working, but later clarified that he had no plans to means-test superannuation.
He reiterated yesterday that a Labour Government would not raise the age of entitlement and would resume contributions to the fund, which were suspended by National.
Mr Peters said Labour "could not be trusted" because it had previously campaigned on a higher Super age and had introduced a surtax when last in Government.
New Zealand First was now the only party which would protect the Super scheme, he said.
Act Party leader David Seymour said Mr English was being evasive and that he should "tell voters the truth - the age of Superannuation is going up".
"The Prime Minister is numerate. He knows that, according to the Retirement Commissioner, the number of people aged 65 and over will double in the next 30 years, meaning changes to superannuation are inevitable."
Voters deserved certainty, Mr Seymour said.
"Playing election games around superannuation only hurts people's ability to plan for retirement."
Act's policy is raise the age of eligibility gradually from 65 to 67, beginning in 2020.
Related Stories
Comments
Re pm's pension comments ..
It worries me when politicians talk about a means test on superannuation payments, after having worked for the government for 32 years paying into the employees super scheme [ compulsory from 17to 25 at 6% on top of a 25% tax rate ,then made redundant in 1990 , I was eligible for a pension in 1992 which was taxed at the then rate of 25c per $ giving me an additional current income of $1011 per month . being 75 ,my question is how much of that would I loose if my old age pension as was means tested . incidentally I have no problems with the wealthy getting a pension a lot of them are still paying a lot of tax including G.S.T.
People paying into the NZ super fund should also beware of what will happen to their income later on with means testing
If he's not upfront it could cost him votes....if he puts the age up it may still cost votes.....
The news is it will go up to 67 in 20 years....anyone born before 1972 will get super at 65.