Grubby politics wearing thin

Photo: RNZ
Photo: ODT files.
It is high time our parliamentarians were representative of the vast majority of the people they purport to represent.

That their sniping, gloating and pillorying is wearing thin is demonstrated by the Labour Party’s frankly revolutionary decision to fight an election with "kindness".

Politics has always been hard and fragility has always been targeted and weakness exploited. Under-performing members of Parliament — especially when they are ministers — are mana from heaven for those who would oppose them; they are weak links to be poked and prodded until the link is broken and their party is forced to shift them from harm’s way.

Decades ago, most of the big hits and big scalps were claimed in the debating chamber, where clever orators armed with facts and uncomfortable questions slowly-but-surely dissected their opponents until their position and policies became untenable. This was all part of the great game, its measured and structured brutality designed to hold MPs to account and to force them to perform to the best of their ability.

Nicky Hager’s book Dirty Politics, released ahead of the 2014 election, was the first of the modern expositions of some of the grubbiest elements of party politics. The tale of hit jobs and public shaming was greeted as a partisan hatchet job, and had little measurable impact on the election. As one of the main protagonists, Cameron Slater, said: "New Zealanders did not seem to care."

Public reaction was muted, too, when an external independent review last year exposed instances of alleged bullying and harassment of parliamentary staffers. The review found unacceptable behaviour was often tolerated or normalised, and there was a perception MPs faced few sanctions for harmful behaviour

Parliament was described as brutal and toxic. Party leaders were told to take more responsibility for their MPs and a code of conduct was recommended. Save promises to promote a healthier workplace, politics seemed to continue as it did beforehand.

Politicians have turned whistleblowers, too, detailing how the line between robust debate and critical examination has become blurred or ignored altogether in the rough-and-tumble of daily points-scoring, competing egos and even barely concealed personal animus. A succession of women MPs have described the casual sexism some MPs use to undermine them in their job and in the House. They have been called hysterical, told to settle down and to stick to their knitting. The Prime Minister has been called a "stupid little girl".

This column has written of this gendered, condescending and disparaging treatment before, but it tends to slip into the distance when compared to the overt nastiness of some of the adults occupying some of the most important public positions in the country.

Outgoing Dunedin South MP Clare Curran last week described the toxicity and bullying she says marked her years in Parliament. Among the humiliations was a photo from the National Party's Mainland Region conference in 2012, in which fellow Dunedin-based MP Michael Woodhouse posed with a blue toilet seat with her face emblazoned on it. The seat was reportedly used as a trophy for a debating competition. Ms Curran told The Spinoff it was sick and humiliating.

The photo was about eight years old, just old enough for Mr Woodhouse to tell media it was not the burning issue of the day. This is true, but a political culture that seems to set cheap shots above decency, is.

There is no question the public good would be poorly served if robust debate and incisive examination were watered down in favour of understanding and "kindness". Voters want their politicians, their policies and their actions exposed to hard questions and relentless scrutiny; valid criticism changes policies.

Politics is not, and never has been, nice. But that "kindness" can become an election strategy tells us how much needs to change.



View all

Because of a free press, or in this case, Times, we know who they are. Bullies are not productive in government..
It's National, perhaps, but not as Conservatives would know it.

If anyone took the time to watch the House live and watched objectively, they will see jacinda behaving not very kind at all. This kindness is simply a PR spin to fool the fools and to conciel the thin veneer of talent or outcomes the government have achieved. Id rather jacinda honour her promise to end poverty and homelessness...but again that was just spin to win votes and the suckers took it hook line and sinker. Jacinda is not kinda, its her modern day socialist model

Not an entirely objective comment. It's not politicking that's the issue, it's emotional assault, bullying and attack from people whom we thought knew better.

If you look at a defamation case in 2011 you will see evidence of some current Labour MPs dishing out some bullying to an employee in the Environment Ministry. It seems hypocritical to complain about bullying when an MP has been party to dishing it out in the past.

It would be interesting to know who employed the overseas based Facebook attack firm that destroyed the leadership of Simon Bridges.

That would be MAGA-Todd.

Simon didn't need any help to destroy his career. He did it all by himself

When I saw the headline "Grubby politics wearing thin", I thought it must refer to Clare Curran playing the victim card, months before an election, over an incident that allegedly happened years ago.

View all

Our journalists are your neighbours

We are the South's eyes and ears in crucial council meetings, at court hearings, on the sidelines of sporting events and on the frontline of breaking news.

As our region faces uncharted waters in the wake of a global pandemic, Otago Daily Times continues to bring you local stories that matter.

We employ local journalists and photographers to tell your stories, as other outlets cut local coverage in favour of stories told out of Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch.

You can help us continue to bring you local news you can trust by becoming a supporter.

Become a Supporter