Huge waste-to-energy plant proposed in South Canterbury

Photo: Newsline/CCC
File Photo: Newsline/CCC
A consortium of local and international businesses aims to build a waste-to-energy plant in South Canterbury, capable of preventing 350,000 tonnes of rubbish from going to landfill each year.

However, the proposal has received stiff opposition from zero waste advocates who say the plant does nothing to reduce the amount of waste that is produced.

Waste-to-energy plants generate energy by burning rubbish to create steam, which is then fed through a turbine to produce electricity.

Spanish recycling services company Urbaser, Chinese environmental management firm Tianying Incorporated and New Zealand's Renew Energy have established the joint venture called South Island Resource Recovery (SIRRL) to look for possible sites near Waimate.

SIRRL said the project would cost $350 million to build, would create more than 100 direct and indirect jobs and could generate 30MW (megawatts) of electricity for the local network, which could also be fed into the national grid.

"New Zealand is in the middle of a landfill waste crisis, as was seen with the 2019 Fox River landfill environmental disaster," SIRRL director Paul Taylor said.

"Waste disposed at municipal landfills grew by 48 percent between 2009 and 2019.

"The proposed plant can run alongside New Zealand's essential waste minimisation and recycling efforts and, at the same time, produce renewable energy to benefit the local economy," he said.

Taylor said it was not competing with recycling.

"Where we see slot in, is after minimising waste, reusing and recycling we're in that gap between there and landfilling.

"Anything that would otherwise drop out of those good process would ultimately go through our plant instead of landfilling it."

He said it would expect to receive industrial waste.

"All emissions from the processing of the waste will meet strict air quality and noise standards set by central government and the regional council."

He said the rubbish burning process would produce water vapour, which is a potent greenhouse gas.

Taylor said only a small amount of vapour was produced and was less of an issue compared with the harsh effects of methane that would be emitted from landfills.

The plant would make money by charging businesses to take their rubbish, while also selling the electricity it produces.

Waste incinerators 'bad idea'

Zero Waste Network chair Marty Hoffart said waste incinerators were a bad idea because they undermine efforts to reduce waste, as they always needed to be fed rubbish.

"You'll never stop the production and the extraction of these [harmful] materials from the front end."

He said to claim that the plant would produce renewable electricity was nonsense.

"How can you produce renewable electricity if you are burning up non-renewable resources?

It was just not possible, Hoffart said.

"The answer to our waste problems isn't burning rubbish," Hoffart said.

"We need to phase out certain types of materials... we need mandatory product stewardship schemes like those currently being considered by government, and we need to commit to a working towards a circular economy."

Community consultation

SIRRL would be meeting with the Waimate community before lodging a resource consent with the district and regional council to build and operate the plant.

Waimate mayor Craig Rowley said he was excited by the project, as it would create many benefits for the district.

"This would include new employment opportunities and is yet another example of the district's appeal to commercial operators," he said.

Comments

Best ignore the unrealistic dreamers and get on with the project; we continue to 3be slow on the uptake.

Is it the right technology ?
One big incinerator plant for all of the South Island will require massive amounts of transport, with equal amounts of empty running and associated emissions
The closest, large source of ''fuel" for this proposal is 200km away !!!
You have the same issue with so called recycling
Every time waste is handled and transported, the so called environmental benefits are reduced and the costs go up because of our geography / population density
There are other technologies that will take all waste and produce oil which can in turn be used for all sorts of purposes.
Plastics, used nappies, tyres, paper, wood, even sewage can be processed via hydrothermal liquefaction
There is no combustion, no need for efficiency of scale and the product can be used at our leisure
Australian company Licella is one such example
We need solutions that address all the issues, not virtue signalling in search of a utopia, nor old ideas like 'lets burn it'
Such plants could be operated by councils, which already have the responsibility of keeping our towns health, if only they would stop chasing their tails and get real !!!

drivesouth-pow-classic-2.png

Our journalists are your neighbours

We are the South's eyes and ears in crucial council meetings, at court hearings, on the sidelines of sporting events and on the frontline of breaking news.

As our region faces uncharted waters in the wake of a global pandemic, Otago Daily Times continues to bring you local stories that matter.

We employ local journalists and photographers to tell your stories, as other outlets cut local coverage in favour of stories told out of Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch.

You can help us continue to bring you local news you can trust by becoming a supporter.

Become a Supporter