You are not permitted to download, save or email this image. Visit image gallery to purchase the image.
Representatives of the Electoral Commission, Ministry of Education and State Services Commission all indicated they had no problems with the rector’s comments on the school’s Facebook page.
The school’s board of trustees may be less comfortable.
Mr McIvor made a lengthy post last Friday about the referendum, essentially arguing against legalisation of cannabis.
Some of the most obvious wasted potential he had seen as an educator of 26 years was as a result of cannabis use, he said.
Board chairman Richard Wingham then defended the post, saying Mr McIvor had not suggested to readers how they ought to vote on the issue.
The board held a neutral position on the cannabis referendum, he said.
By 4.50pm yesterday, Mr McIvor’s post had attracted 476 comments and Mr Wingham’s 196 comments.
Some were supportive but others took issue with Mr McIvor using the school’s Facebook page to get across his message and many objected to the school straying from political neutrality.
An Electoral Commission spokeswoman said expression of personal views online was exempt from the rules for referendum advertisements.
The rector’s post did not breach electoral rules.
General election guidance from the State Services Commission says the convention that state services should be politically neutral applies at all times, including in relation to elections, by-elections and referendums.
Ministry of Education sector enablement and support deputy director Katrina Casey said state agencies needed to be politically neutral and could not encourage electors to vote for specific parties, policies or candidates.
"The referendum on the legalisation of cannabis is not a party political matter," she said.
"This is an important social issue, and, like other social issues, people are free to express their views about it."
She pointed out the rector was employed in the wider public sector and "his role is not close to, nor involved in, providing advice to ministers".
"The school board has made it clear the rector’s views are his own and not the board’s. We are satisfied that this is a matter for the school and not the ministry.
"If the school’s parent community have any concerns, they should contact the school’s board of trustees."
A State Services Commission spokesman said it was a matter for the school board and Ministry of Education. The commission had seen the ministry’s response and was satisfied with it, he said.
The Otago Daily Times has made unsuccessful attempts to reach Mr McIvor for comment this week.
Mr Wingham indicated yesterday the school would release a statement soon.
Otago Secondary Principals’ Association president Linda Miller said it was a difficult situation.
"It illustrates the challenge for principals in speaking out about an issue they see as being of concern to their students when that issue is in the political arena."