Co-ordinator says hospital art needs thought

Aesthetic co-ordinator Barbara Brinsley stands in front of a Neil Grant ceramic, one of the larger artworks at Dunedin Hospital, which she wants to see moved to the new hospital. Photo: Peter McIntosh
Aesthetic co-ordinator Barbara Brinsley stands in front of a Neil Grant ceramic, one of the larger artworks at Dunedin Hospital, which she wants to see moved to the new hospital. Photo: Peter McIntosh
Those planning the new Dunedin Hospital need to also start planning where the hospital's about 2500 art works, sculptures and other installations will go, the woman who has helped develop the collection says.

Southern District Health Board aesthetic co-ordinator Barbara Brinsley says planning for a new home for some of the larger works, like the Neil Grant ceramic at the entrance to the hospital, needs to start ''sooner rather than later''.

'They're too busy on their screens 10 blocks down the road, wondering how they're going to direct traffic,'' Mrs Brinsley said.

The planners were aware of the issue, but had not ''got off their little butts'' and visited the hospital to see what sort of spaces some of the art works would need.

But Southern Partnership Group chairman Pete Hodgson said it was still too early in the planning process for those decisions to be made.

Such decisions would have to wait for architects, yet to be officially confirmed, to come on board before more detailed designs were developed.

He did, however, indicate there could be more room in the new hospital for works to be placed.

Mrs Brinsley spoke yesterday after a talk on art and wellness, at the Dunedin Public Art Gallery, in which the importance of art in hospitals was discussed.

The hospital's collection includes works by the likes of Ralph Hotere, Shona McFarlane and Derek Ball.

She said moving the artworks had been discussed by the art advisory committee, and a representative from the hospital rebuild had spoken at a meeting.

However nobody from the rebuild had walked around the hospital and looked at installations such as the John Middleditch copper fountain.

Spaces were needed in the new hospital for such works.

Planners needed to consider what moving works such as the fountain, the Derek Ball kinetic sculpture in the hospital foyer, or the Neil Grant ceramic, would involve.

She wanted planners, sooner, rather than later, to visualise large and important art works in the new hospital.

It was not the monetary value of the art that concerned her, but the proven benefit it provided patients.

Mr Hodgson said it was ''far too early to give any assurances'', and the hospital architects, who are expected to be announced soon, would be in charge of dealing with such design issues.

However the new hospital would almost certainly have a significantly greater floor area than the current version.

That would also mean more space where artworks could be placed.

''I don't want to go any further than that,'' Mr Hodgson said.

Dealing with finding places for the larger works would also be architects' job.

david.loughrey@odt.co.nz

Comments

Some of the artwork around the current hospital is quite questionable to be honest. Outside the paediatric ward, for example, there is one piece that looks reasonable as you walk by but on closer inspection it contains images of hypodermic needles and the subject has written a bit of a horrifying note to his daughter. Perhaps more thought could be put into the kinds of artworks that are placed throughout the hospital? They just seemed placed anywhere with no forethought as to how patients may see them and some are just plain distasteful. Honestly though, I would think most people would be more concerned with getting this new hospital built than the artwork that is held within. Maybe Mrs Brinsley needs a gallery of her own?

Entirely agree, how privileged must this woman be to raising this as an 'issue' now when the build is years and years off. Hows about we actually get, say, at least the layout right for patient care first.

Is this a joke? a lot of the artwork is absolutely atrocious and lacks any redeemable quality. Perhaps if they culled 70% of them some could be moved into the new build, in appropriate areas and minimal instead of all cluttered up like how they look now. of course there is value in art and wellbeing - but only if done right. Is 'aesthetic coordinator' even a role? sounds made up to me!