Govt introducing capital gains tax by stealth: Seymour

Act leader David Seymour. Photo: NZ Herald
Act leader David Seymour. Photo: NZ Herald
The Government is being accused of planning to introduce a capital gains tax by stealth, after Finance Minister Grant Robertson asked Treasury for advice on extending the brightline test.

Act New Zealand has raised an eyebrow at the development, given Jacinda Ardern has already ruled out implementing a capital gains tax (CGT) while she is Prime Minister.

Yesterday, Robertson revealed a letter he had written to Reserve Bank Governor Adrian Orr, which asked him to consider adding house price stability to its remit.

In addition to this, he said the Government was looking into a number of demand-side measures – this included extending the brightline test.

The brightline test, introduced by the then-National Government in 2015, is in many ways similar to a CGT.

It means that if someone sold a residential home within two years of its purchase, they are required to pay tax – but there are a number of exceptions, such as if it was a family home.

In early 2018, the Labour Government extended the brightline test to five years.

A CGT is a broader tax, lumped on the sale of a house but without a fixed time period like the one mandated in the brightline test.

When the Tax Working Group was asked to investigate implementing a CGT in New Zealand, it was told that it would not apply to the family home.

But, despite the group ultimately recommending New Zealand should adopt a CGT, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern ruled it out.

"Under my leadership, we will no longer campaign for, or implement a CGT – not because I don't believe in it, but because I don't believe New Zealand does," she said in April 2017.

Act leader David Seymour said today that by asking the Treasury to investigate extending the brightline test, "Labour is planning to introduce a CGT by stealth".

Seymour points out that when the brightline test first went through Parliament, he had said that it might extend far outside the two years it was originally mandated for.

"It is a measure that will grow from two years to five to 10 to 15 years. You watch: it will eventually apply to a wider range of homes. It is the acorn that the National Party has planted that will grow into a full-blown CGT."

Despite this, Act voted in favour of the bill at its third reading, in 2015.


If Seymour is correct then I agree with him, it is appalling.
The Govt should just introduce a Capital Gains Tax CGT, immediately. A hefty one at that. The only property that can be exempt is a certified family home of which any individual or group can have only one. Any Trust that owns a property should be not be exempt from CGT. And it should be hefty.
An alternative would be to re-introduce stamp duty, payable by the purchaser of their second and subsequent property, again a hefty Duty based on the purchase price..
The effect of this would be to deter investment in real estate and encourage other forms of investment.






Our journalists are your neighbours

We are the South's eyes and ears in crucial council meetings, at court hearings, on the sidelines of sporting events and on the frontline of breaking news.

As our region faces uncharted waters in the wake of a global pandemic, Otago Daily Times continues to bring you local stories that matter.

We employ local journalists and photographers to tell your stories, as other outlets cut local coverage in favour of stories told out of Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch.

You can help us continue to bring you local news you can trust by becoming a supporter.

Become a Supporter