The Children's Commissioner says most people support law changes that give children the same protection from assault as adults.
The commission today released the results of a survey which concluded that 43 percent of those surveyed who knew of the law change supported it.
"Only 28 percent were opposed to the law change. The remainder were neutral," Commissioner Cindy Kiro said.
The survey is part of efforts to judge public opinion in the lead-up to a referendum taking place in August next year on the 18-month-old law, which removed the defence of reasonable force for disciplining a child.
Dr Kiro said more than 80 percent of adults surveyed gave a positive response to the question: Should children be entitled to the same protection from assault as adults? The survey presents a different picture to the images pushed by opponents to changes to the Crimes (Substituted Section 59) Amendment Act 2007, she said.
Dr Kiro said attitudes towards child discipline had changed since the office first surveyed people in 1993.
Then 87 percent of survey respondents thought there were times when it was all right to use physical punishment with children.
This year's survey showed that had reduced to 58 percent of respondents.
But lobby group Family First NZ said the survey showed nothing new.
It said only 20 percent of those surveyed disagreed with smacking in certain circumstances.
"This is consistent with all other polls done throughout the year including research commissioned by Family First -- that there is an 80 percent opposition to the anti-smacking law because most people know that smacking for the purpose of correction is not child abuse," Family First New Zealand national director Bob McCoskrie said.
The 43 percent support for the law change would include a large number of people who are optimistic about the police discretion clause introduced at the 11th hour, he said.
However, Family First was concerned that only 80 percent said that children should be protected from assault.
"This figure should be 100 percent. But the Children's Commissioner has simply caused confusion by misrepresenting the effect of the law and the difference between assault and a light smack.
"This is yet more wasted government funding on information that has told us nothing new, done by an office trying to justify its existence."
Family First was calling for the Families Commission and Children's Commission to be replaced by a Minister of Families in Cabinet.
