Majority rules in council divide

ORC chairwoman Marian Hobbs. PHOTO: ODT FILES
ORC chairwoman Marian Hobbs. PHOTO: ODT FILES
Otago regional councillors’ push to dump their chairwoman has been decried as more than simply a bad look for a council that was supposed to rehabilitate its image after two lackluster terms.

Their move to unseat Marian Hobbs at a meeting on July 8 has been called anti-democratic and anti-policy. In the hot mess of online comments, the councillors exercising their right to move against her have been called much, much worse.

It is entirely fair to criticise councillors for a performance that fails to meet official measures and voter expectations. It is not fair, however, to criticise them for following through on the political component of their job.

For that is what is happening here. Regardless of their individual motivations, they are moving as a block to challenge a chairwoman whom they suggest no longer represents them as a council.

Ms Hobbs was not elected to the chair by the good voters of Otago. Councillors voted her there, 7 to 5, at their first council meeting.

As her then newly-elected deputy Cr Michael Laws said, the electorate wanted change after two terms in which it had not covered itself in glory. It was a fresh chance to reset the council’s course.

The course was well-and-truly reset. That this would be a testy first term became clear within weeks, when Ms Hobbs used her prerogative and did not let councillors question speakers at the council’s busy public forum.

Cr Kevin Malcolm asked how he could do his job if he could not ask questions, beginning his question to the chair with ‘‘with respect’’. Ms Hobbs cut him off: ‘‘There’s no respect,’’ she said, adding ‘‘Yes, I’m tough, people.’’

Since then, Ms Hobbs has been tough. She has maintained the very strong need for the council to meet its national policy obligations and she has made it clear no one lobby will have a disproportionate influence.

As this happened, she butted heads with councillors. In late March, seven of them called for a 12-month re-evaluation of the council’s policies and finances, including the withdrawal and suspension of plan changes in progress.

They also wanted a review of the council’s Regional Policy Statement, a significant body of work that has far-reaching implications for landowners and for the environment right across Otago.

On the numbers alone, the letter showed the majority was not in step with Ms Hobbs. It showed her ability to get what she wanted done, was under threat.

The former Labour Party MP said as much a few days later, writing to the Environment Minister to ask if she ‘‘lost the Omnibus Plan and work on the [Regional Policy Statement], would you consider putting in a commissioner?’’.

It was a letter in which a sitting chairwoman raised the prospect of having a non-elected official direct her council. Installing a commissioner is a remarkable sign of no confidence.

The letter set the course for the July 8 meeting. As this became clear, Ms Hobbs vowed not to go quietly. In so doing, she has tacitly acknowledged she is on the way out. She has also served those who would oppose her with the evidence they might need to show she is not in step with her council.

In her most recent chairwoman’s report, she made it clear she believed moves against her were an attempt by the elected council to ignore national policy statements and reviews of its poor planning.

Councillors say Ms Hobbs’ claims are simply not true. Cr Laws, in particular, said it is ‘‘all about personality, not policy nor programmes’’. The claims were ‘‘almost a fantastic delusion’’ denigrating why every councillor stood for the council, he said.

They also indicate why councillors from both sides of the plan change debate want new leadership. Simply, it appears the leader they elected is now not leading them in the way they had, collectively, expected.

These councillors are the majority, elected by voters who knew what they were getting when they voted them in. The divide in the council may well reflect the divide in the expectations of the electorate that put them there.

 

Comments

View all

Hobbs is arrogant and immature. Leadership is different from bullying and she just doesn't get it. Any normal person would simply resign. Hobbs must have a huge ego because she won't. Nothing will get done with her in charge. The battle lines are drawn and nobody is going to budge. This isn't a policy issue it's a lack of leadership issue. Pro Hobbs supporters will make unsubstantiated allegations impuning the integrity of anybody who wants Hobbs out. I'd listen if there was a single shred of evidence. There is none. Hobbs is a poor leader and an ideologue. She spit the dummy one to many times. The rest of the elected board have had enought. Maybe those theatrics worked for Hobbs in the dark ages but politics have changed. Science has changed. Hobbs has to go. We all want compliance with the existing policies and law. Hobbs has turned this into a personnel issue and made it a popularity contest. We just want and end to the disfunctional leadership. Hobbs has to go!

Whenever a comment starts with an insult you have to question the giver. When the rest of the comment is insults it's just not worth considering.

A good summary of events, but to be fair the majority of councillors should of known what they were getting when they voted for Hobbs to be chair. My hope is that a commissioner is put in place and in the next local elections there is better coverage on those hoping to be elected, including their conflicts of interest. During the last elections I know of many people who voted for Aaron Hawkins because they thought he was going to improve the bus service and fix environmental problems. They seemed oblivious to the fact that the DCC has very little control over these issues compared to the ORC.

Pat, you should remove your red eye patch

Whatever does this mean? Why insult a perfectly reasonable commenter?

Agree. Ms Hobbs got the most votes from us the voters which says a lot. She has a track record in politics, public service, and environmental issues and the last election results show that her calibre is just what voters want.

Hawkins got less votes than vandervis but stv saved him. Sadly hawkins is going to drive the dcc into more debt because he is an ideologue.

View all

Our journalists are your neighbours

We are the South's eyes and ears in crucial council meetings, at court hearings, on the sidelines of sporting events and on the frontline of breaking news.

As our region faces uncharted waters in the wake of a global pandemic, Otago Daily Times continues to bring you local stories that matter.

We employ local journalists and photographers to tell your stories, as other outlets cut local coverage in favour of stories told out of Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch.

You can help us continue to bring you local news you can trust by becoming a supporter.

Become a Supporter