
As new United States President Donald Trump rolls out his executive orders, many of which have direct ramifications
for us, as Vladimir Putin, Bashar al-Assad and Benjamin Netanyahu defy with impunity world outrage, as populist forces in France, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK thump their kettle drums, how do we trump Trump? How do those of us who still believe in sustainability, social justice, rationality, and simple truthfulness respond creatively? As Elizabeth Warren said to the huge rally of women in Boston: "We can whimper, we can whine, or we can fight."
But what does that mean, concretely, for us in New Zealand? My hunch is we should not rush prematurely into action, but stick with our despair for a while, deepen and process it. Have a good hard look at what we are up against. After all, the very wells of communication are being progressively poisoned. Inconvenient facts are simply brushed aside. Apples become bananas, lies transmuted into "alternative facts". Journalists are the enemy (in a so-called democracy). Globalisation and automation have spawned the crudest ethnocentrism and protectionism; the brutality of Islamic State its own counter-brutality. Torture is OK again. Bully tactics replace arguments and negotiation. One wild option to finance the beautiful wall to keep America secure follows another. Sanctuary cities are threatened. All this is manic stuff. The madmen who rule the roost are utterly determined, and think they are on a roll.
For our part, how clear are we what we stand for, how determined are we that the "know nothing" brigade should not succeed? We need to remember we are our own best strength. One important clue was the affirmation of identity by the massed women’s protests in the United States. We are America, they said. Pluralism is here to stay. This whipped-up "whitelash" will wither on the stalk. At the Dunedin protest last week it was clear the feminist group who organised it was equally clear about its identity, how it is threatened, and why it must be defended. They are well ahead of the rest of us there.
The truth is we have let the old bastions of identity atrophy: the trade unions, the churches, the political parties. As with the Springbok tour and the peace movement, we need to develop new networks with the expertise and imagination and passion to reach out to the inner city and the suburbs and rural New Zealand and wake people up.
One thing is for sure. The old liberal elite, symbolised by the Clintons, has lost credibility. We need a new consensus. This new inspiration may come from unexpected directions. At last week’s traditionalist Burns night in Dunedin’s Toitu Otago Settlers Museum, the winning poem, videoed from Scotland, lashed out at all Trump stood for in the earthiest of vernacular outrage. Our poets, our cartoonists, our dramatists are our best allies to get the message out.
We need to stop twitching at Trump’s latest Twitter, and stand tall, stake out our own inviolable territory. What are our non-negotiables? As we get into election mode will we let personalities and slush funds dominate or will there be a focus on real issues: a fair go for all children, affordable housing, clean rivers, a decent minimum wage, a curb on inflated executive payments and bonuses? After all, Trump is not the problem. It is the despair and alienation of those who voted him in.
Our economic system, worldwide, is bankrupt. We need to address that: the ludicrous disparity between rich and poor, the draining away of our most precious resources, the short-term thinking which can only see dollar signs. What transcends our personal immediacies? Hope of a better society, of course, menaces us profoundly. The mobilisation of energy and grey matter it demands will knock us off our comfortable chairs. It could be fun, though. It could trump Trump. And God knows how utterly imperative it is.
- Peter Matheson is a Dunedin historian.
Comments
Transcendence is rational, logical, ego free and unemotional. That's if you're talking about doing battle. The other transcendence is religious. If you are talking about 'enemy', a concept I reject, don't underestimate opposing forces as 'know nothings'.










