You are not permitted to download, save or email this image. Visit image gallery to purchase the image.
The precipice of a no-deal Brexit looms ever closer.
The ruling Conservative Party and the Cabinet are split every which way, and Labour, the main opposition, continues to peddle the fantasy that a better deal to leave the European Union is possible.
Prime Minister Theresa May is humiliated and next to nobody wants her EU deal, a phoney Brexit in the eyes of hardliners and the worst of both worlds in the view of others. The approval rating for how Labour’s Jeremy Corbyn is handling Brexit, meanwhile, is much worse than even Mrs May’s.
The public, in the face of all this, are confused, exasperated and concerned. Mrs May and the Conservatives are not up to the job, and neither is Labour. Brexit dominates public discourse as Britain blunders on.
In such an impossible position, calls grow for a second referendum. And, despite the difficulties a second poll poses, that is what should occur.
Reports at the weekend suggested Mrs May’s team was warming to the idea. But a statement from her office said "we cannot ... abdicate responsibility for this decision".
One claim from the leadership is that a further referendum would divide the country and another is that it would threaten faith in democracy.
It must be remembered how badly tainted the first vote was. Pro-Brexiters blatantly lied about the EU, made totally unrealistic promises and Facebook information was stolen and used to play up xenophobia. This went well beyond the expected rough and tumble, exaggerations and obfuscations of normal politics.
It is true another vote would be complex and demanding. It would take months to have everything in place and just what questions would be asked and how votes would be counted could be a tall order. A looming EU election in May could also complicate matters. There are legitimate fears, too, that another poll would provide an excuse for rioting and disorder.
As well, an indecisive majority either way would leave matters unsettled. Would there then be a call for a third vote? "Neverendum" perhaps, as some are calling it.
At least, the act of Brexiting would be able to be suspended. Britain, it has been established, does not need EU approval to call off its foolishness.
As it is, leave day on March 29 looms fast.
Much more effort will have to go towards what happens if, as seems increasing a likely option, Britain crashes out of the EU. Most mainstream analysts see this as dire.
As that day approaches, one possibility is that Mrs May’s unsatisfactory Brexit deal will win enough support across Parliament in desperation votes to avoid the disastrous no deal at all scenario.
Far better than going to this brink and perhaps over it is to give the British people the chance to reverse their mistake. The stakes are towering, and this is what needs to happen.