Embarrassing and disgraceful behaviour from Labour

The Labour Party does not have very much cause to feel grateful for anything right now. But it should get down on bended knees and thank the Almighty that hardly anybody would have been watching Parliament late on Wednesday afternoon.

Anyone doing so would have witnessed a spectacle which would immediately have brought several words to mind - words like pitiful, pathetic, embarrassing and disgraceful.

The House was once again debating - or rather trying to debate - the private members' Bill sponsored by Act MP Heather Roy which, when passed, will make membership of tertiary student associations no longer compulsory.

Labour vehemently opposes the measure. It has mounted a filibuster for months to block the Bill's passage - something which it is perfectly entitled to do. It has managed to maintain the filibuster because private members' Bills only come up for debate every second Wednesday when the House is in session. Not being Government Bills, they are not subject to being passed under urgency, which soon stifles opposition MPs' appetites for a filibuster.

With Parliament scheduled to rise in early October ahead of the general election, Labour has been punting on those Wednesdays running out before the voluntary membership Bill can be passed. If that happens, the legislation will almost certainly be carried over to the next Parliament, however. Unless Labour wins the election - which is looking highly unlikely - the Bill will ultimately become law anyway.

That is for the future. What matters now is that last Wednesday things shifted from straight filibuster to pure farce. The only characters missing from this Trevor Mallard-orchestrated protest becoming a complete pantomime were Chuckles the Clown and Dorothy the Dinosaur.

Labour not only demeaned itself, again something it is perfectly at liberty to do. It also demeaned Parliament - and that is unacceptable.

For the best part of an hour, Labour MPs raised timewasting points of order and forced a series of pointless votes to try and stop debate on Mrs Roy's Bill from even getting under way.

Labour made repeated demands that Speaker Lockwood Smith be recalled to the chamber to rule on decisions made by National's Eric Roy, who was chairing the House. This went beyond the ridiculous, by including decisions by Mr Roy (no relation to Heather Roy) granting those very Labour MPs the call to speak in the debate - a perverse case of biting the hand that feeds.

Those MPs no doubt thought this was all terribly clever. They should watch the replays on Parliament TV. They looked juvenile. Worse, their behaviour would have confirmed everything the public thinks is wrong with Parliament.

Eric Roy's patience eventually ran out, and he warned Labour to stop trifling with the chair. From that point, things got confused, as Mr Mallard was told to leave the chamber, but somehow remained, and proper debate finally got under way.

Labour's obstructive behaviour seemed to flow in part by it being miffed at being outflanked by Heather Roy. Much of Labour's filibustering has been on the Bill which has precedence on Parliament's order paper ahead of her measure.

That uncontroversial Bill deals with the workings of the Royal Society of New Zealand, an academic body devoted to the promotion of science. Under normal circumstances, Parliament would have dealt with it in minutes - not months.

It is a further black mark on Labour that not only has an innocent third party been caught in the crossfire, the presence of the Royal Society measure on the order paper has been exploited for purely political motives. However, Heather Roy caught Labour napping by moving the House report progress on the Royal Society of New Zealand Bill and move on to debating her measure. The National-Act majority duly ensured this happened.

Labour justifiably questioned the use of such a motion to curtail debate. Lockwood Smith agreed it was something Parliament's standing orders committee should examine.

However, he ruled that the vote on the motion should stand for the time being. From then on, things quickly went downhill.

The Greens should likewise hold their heads in shame by being party to Labour's shoddy behaviour. They put much stock in parliamentary probity. Their only defence for voting in favour of Labour's dubious motions was that Keith Locke, the sole Green MP in the House at the time, seemed distracted.

Some of the Labour MPs caught up in this episode must now surely regret it.

One such MP, Wellington Central's MP Grant Robertson, felt obliged to post a lengthy explanation on Red Alert, the Labour MPs' blog.

He made no apology for the ways in which Labour was trying to stop Mrs Roy's Bill. He admitted it was "unedifying" - surely the understatement of the week - but claimed it was all part and parcel of parliamentary practice.

Well, no. A clear demarcation can be drawn between trying to delay a measure's progress through Parliament by filibuster and trying to find and exploit gaps, loopholes and apparent anomalies in Parliament's rules to subvert the will of the majority. Labour crossed that line.

On top of that, Labour's filibustering has denied other parties' MPs the opportunity to get their own private members' Bills - some of which are worthy measures deserving of enactment - on to the order paper. That is unfair. But it is symptomatic of Labour's lingering arrogance from its years in power.

Incredibly, Labour continues to try and pull the wool over voters' eyes by promising to bring in private members' Bills to block things like National's plans for partial state asset sales. Such talk is poppycock. The reality is such Bills would first have to be lucky enough to be drawn in the ballot which determines which Bills get on to the order paper. The last ballot saw 24 Bills vying for a lone spot.

Furthermore, there has not been a ballot since November last year. No prizes for guessing who is responsible for that.

John Armstrong is the political correspondent for The New Zealand Herald.



Add a Comment

Our journalists are your neighbours

We are the South's eyes and ears in crucial council meetings, at court hearings, on the sidelines of sporting events and on the frontline of breaking news.

As our region faces uncharted waters in the wake of a global pandemic, Otago Daily Times continues to bring you local stories that matter.

We employ local journalists and photographers to tell your stories, as other outlets cut local coverage in favour of stories told out of Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch.

You can help us continue to bring you local news you can trust by becoming a supporter.

Become a Supporter